Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25982981›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2015

Using pre-screening methods for an effective and reliable site characterization at megasites.

Mette Algreen, Mariusz Kalisz, Marcel Stalder, Eugeniu Martac, Janusz Krupanek, Stefan Trapp, Stephan Bartke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mette AlgreenDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark.
Mariusz KaliszInstitute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, 6 Kossutha Street, Katowice, Poland.
Marcel StalderSolGeo AG, Dornacherplatz 3, 4501, Solothurn, Switzerland.
Eugeniu MartacFugro Consult GmbH, Volkmaroder Str. 8c, 38104, Braunschweig, Germany.
Janusz KrupanekInstitute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, 6 Kossutha Street, Katowice, Poland. krupanek@ietu.katowice.pl.
Stefan TrappDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark.
Stephan BartkeHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper illustrates the usefulness of pre-screening methods for an effective characterization of polluted sites. We applied a sequence of site characterization methods to a former Soviet military airbase with likely fuel and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) contamination in shallow groundwater and subsoil. The methods were (i) phytoscreening with tree cores; (ii) soil gas measurements for CH4, O2, and photoionization detector (PID); (iii) direct-push with membrane interface probe (MIP) and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) sensors; (iv) direct-push sampling; and (v) sampling from soil and from groundwater monitoring wells. Phytoscreening and soil gas measurements are rapid and inexpensive pre-screening methods. Both indicated subsurface pollution and hot spots successfully. The direct-push sensors yielded 3D information about the extension and the volume of the subsurface plume. This study also expanded the applicability of tree coring to BTEX compounds and tested the use of high-resolution direct-push sensors for light hydrocarbons. Comparison of screening results to results from conventional soil and groundwater sampling yielded in most cases high rank correlation and confirmed the findings. The large-scale application of non- or low-invasive pre-screening can be of help in directing and focusing the subsequent, more expensive investigation methods. The rapid pre-screening methods also yielded useful information about potential remediation methods. Overall, we see several benefits of a stepwise screening and site characterization scheme, which we propose in conclusion.

Indexed as

BenzeneBenzene DerivativesEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationGroundwaterHazardous WasteHumansPetroleum PollutionSoilSoil PollutantsTolueneTreesWater Pollutants, ChemicalXylenesBenzeneBenzene DerivativesethylbenzeneHazardous WasteSoilSoil PollutantsTolueneWater Pollutants, ChemicalXylenesBrownfieldsContaminationDirect-pushPhytoscreeningProbe technologiesSite characterizationSoil gasTree core

Identifiers

PMID25982981
PMCPMC4592496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.