Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25982372›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2015

Dendritic cells transfected with heat-shock protein 70 messenger RNA for patients with hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 1 dose escalation clinical trial.

Yoshinari Maeda, Kiyoshi Yoshimura, Hiroto Matsui, Yoshitaro Shindo, Takao Tamesa, Yukio Tokumitsu, Noriaki Hashimoto, Yoshihiro Tokuhisa, Kazuhiko Sakamoto, Kouhei Sakai and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Natural carrier systems in cancer vaccines and immunotherapy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. mRNA vaccines in disease prevention and treatment.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  15. P38 kinase in gastrointestinal cancers.Cancer gene therapy · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Heat shock proteins and viral infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Heat Shock Proteins in Lymphoma Immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshinari MaedaDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan, y.maeda@kousei-h.jp.
Kiyoshi Yoshimura
Hiroto Matsui
Yoshitaro Shindo
Takao Tamesa
Yukio Tokumitsu
Noriaki Hashimoto
Yoshihiro Tokuhisa
Kazuhiko Sakamoto
Kouhei Sakai
Yutaka Suehiro
Yuji Hinoda
Koji Tamada
Shigefumi Yoshino
Shoichi Hazama
Masaaki Oka
Yamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe previously reported overexpression of heat-shock protein (HSP) 70 in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using proteomic profiling and immunohistochemical staining (IHS). This suggested that HSP70 could be a molecular target for treatment of HCC.

methodsTwelve patients with HCV-related HCC were enrolled in a phase 1 clinical trial. Dendritic cells (DCs) transfected with HSP70 mRNA (HSP70-DCs) induced by electroporation were injected intradermally. Patients were treated three times every 3 weeks. The number of HSP70-DCs injected was 1 × 10(7) as the lowest dose, then 2 × 10(7) as the medium dose, and then 3 × 10(7) as the highest dose. Immunological analyses were performed.

findingsNo adverse effects of grade III/IV, except one grade III liver abscess at the 3 × 10(7) dose, were observed. Thus, we added three more patients to confirm whether 3 × 10(7) is an appropriate dose. Eventually, we chose 3 × 10(7) as the recommended dose of DCs. Complete response (CR) without any recurrence occurred in two patients, stable disease in five, and progression of disease in five. The two patients with CR have had no recurrence for 44 and 33 months, respectively. IHS in one patient who underwent partial hepatectomy showed infiltration of CD8+ T cells and granzyme B in tumors, indicating that the dominant immune effector cells were cytotoxic T lymphocytes with tumor-killing activity.

interpretationThis study demonstrated that HSP70-DCs therapy is both safe and feasible in patients with HCV-related HCC. Further clinical trials should be considered.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytotoxicity, ImmunologicDendritic CellsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansImmunotherapyInjections, IntradermalLiver NeoplasmsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25982372
PMCPMC11028566
OpenAlexW2096744412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.