ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2018
Multiple Object Tracking Reveals Object-Based Grouping Interference in Children with ASD.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing Attention Resource Capacity in Autism: A Multiple Object Tracking Study.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024Article
- Perceptual Grouping in Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Exploratory Magnetoencephalography Study.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024Article
- Multiple object-tracking isolates feedback-specific load in attention and learning.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Connection-based and object-based grouping in multiple-object tracking: A developmental study.The British journal of developmental psychology · 2018Article
- Superior Disembedding in Children with ASD: New Tests Using Abstract, Meaningful, and 3D Contexts.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2018Article
- Local Versus Global Processing in Autism: Special Section Editorial.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2018Article
- Visual Search in ASD: Instructed Versus Spontaneous Local and Global Processing.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The multiple object tracking (MOT) paradigm has proven its value in targeting a number of aspects of visual cognition. This study used MOT to investigate the effect of object-based grouping, both in children with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A modified MOT task was administered to both groups, who had to track and distinguish four targets that moved randomly amongst four distracters, irrespective of the grouping condition. No group difference was revealed between children with and without ASD: both showed adequate MOT abilities and a similar amount of grouping interference. Implications of the current result are considered for previous MOT studies, the developmental trajectory of perceptual grouping, and the idea of heightened sensitivity to task characteristics in ASD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25982309What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.