Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25982153›Full record

ReviewTrends in ecology & evolution2015

Hybrid zones: windows on climate change.

Scott A Taylor, Erica L Larson, Richard G Harrison

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in ecology & evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Digest: Habitat associations shape a hybrid zone in killifish.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Scott A TaylorCornell Lab of Ornithology, Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA; Cornell University, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: sat235@cornell.edu.
Erica L LarsonUniversity of Montana, Division of Biological Sciences, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.
Richard G HarrisonCornell University, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

Funding

Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation and the developmental basis of hybrid male stR01HD073439 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI GOOD, JEFFREY · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073439NICHD NIH HHS R01HD73439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defining the impacts of anthropogenic climate change on biodiversity and species distributions is currently a high priority. Niche models focus primarily on predicted changes in abiotic factors; however, species interactions and adaptive evolution will impact the ability of species to persist in the face of changing climate. Our review focuses on the use of hybrid zones to monitor responses of species to contemporary climate change. Monitoring hybrid zones provides insight into how range boundaries shift in response to climate change by illuminating the combined effects of species interactions and physiological sensitivity. At the same time, the semipermeable nature of species boundaries allows us to document adaptive introgression of alleles associated with response to climate change.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemGenetics, PopulationHybridization, GeneticAnimal DistributionAnimalsBiodiversityPlant DispersalPopulation Dynamicsadaptive introgressiondistributiongene flowhybridizationrange limits

Identifiers

PMID25982153
PMCPMC4794265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.