Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25982110›Full record

ArticleJACC. Heart failure2015

The Hospitalization Burden and Post-Hospitalization Mortality Risk in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From the I-PRESERVE Trial (Irbesartan in Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction).

Peter E Carson, Inder S Anand, Sithu Win, Thomas Rector, Markus Haass, Jose Lopez-Sendon, Alan Miller, John R Teerlink, Michel White, Robert S McKelvie and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Heart failure, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic Models in Heart Failure: Hope or Hype?Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Peter E CarsonWashington Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia. Electronic address: peter.carson@med.va.gov.
Inder S AnandVeterans Affairs Health Care System and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sithu WinVeterans Affairs Health Care System and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Thomas RectorVeterans Affairs Health Care System and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Markus HaassTheresienkrankenhaus, Mannheim, Germany.
Jose Lopez-SendonHospital Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain.
Alan MillerUniversity of Florida-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida.
John R TeerlinkSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Michel WhiteMontreal Heart Institute Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Robert S McKelviePopulation Health Research Institute and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michel KomajdaUniversité Paris, Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France.
Michael R ZileRalph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
John J McMurrayBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Center, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Barry MassieSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
University of Minnesota · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USBritish Heart Foundation · GBGeorgetown University · USHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESMedical University of South Carolina · USMontreal Heart Institute · CAPopulation Health Research Institute · CASorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction and the causes of hospitalization and post-hospitalization mortality.

backgroundAlthough hospitalizations in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction are common, there are limited data from clinical trials on the causes of admission and the influence of hospitalizations on subsequent mortality risk.

methodsPatients (n = 4,128) with New York Heart Association functional class II to IV HF and left ventricular ejection fractions >45% were enrolled in I-PRESERVE (Irbesartan in Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction). A blinded events committee adjudicated cardiovascular hospitalizations and all deaths using predefined and standardized definitions. The risk for death after HF, any-cause, or non-HF hospitalization was assessed using time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsA total of 2,278 patients had 5,863 hospitalizations during the 49 months of follow-up, of which 3,585 (61%) were recurrent hospitalizations. For any-cause hospitalizations, 26.5% of patients died during follow-up, with an incident mortality rate of 11.1 deaths per 100 patient-years (PYs) and an adjusted hazard ratio of 5.32 (95% confidence interval: 4.21 to 6.23). Overall, 53.6% of hospitalizations were classified as cardiovascular and 43.7% as noncardiovascular, with 2.7% not classifiable. HF was the largest single cause of initial (17.6%) and overall (21.1%) hospitalizations, although, after HF hospitalization, a substantially higher proportion of readmissions were due to primary HF causes (40%). HF hospitalization occurred in 685 patients, with 41% deaths during follow-up, an incident mortality rate of 19.3 deaths per 100 PYs. The adjusted hazard ratio was 2.93 (95% confidence interval: 2.40 to 3.57) relative to patients who were not hospitalized for HF and was greater in those with longer durations of hospitalization. There were 1,593 patients with only non-HF hospitalizations, 21% of whom died during follow-up, with an incident mortality rate of 8.7 deaths per 100 PYs and an adjusted hazard ratio of 4.25 (95% confidence interval: 3.27 to 5.32). The risk for death was highest in the first 30 days and declined over time for all hospitalization categories. Patients not hospitalized for HF or for any cause had observed incident mortality rates of 3.8 and 1.3 deaths per 100 PYs, respectively.

conclusionsIn I-PRESERVE, HFpEF patients hospitalized for any reason, and especially for HF, were at high risk for subsequent death, particularly early. The findings support the need for careful attention in the post-discharge time period including attention to comorbid conditions. Among those hospitalized for HF, the high mortality rate and increased proportion of readmissions due to HF (highest during the first 30 days), suggest that this group would be an appropriate target for investigation of new interventions.

Indexed as

Stroke VolumeAgedFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansMalePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRisk Factorsheart failurehospitalizationspreserved ejection fractionprognosis

Identifiers

PMID25982110
OpenAlexW1609012896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.