Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25982054›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2015

Increasing the Permeability of the Blood-brain Barrier in Three Different Models in vivo.

Wei-Ye Liu, Zhi-Bin Wang, Yue Wang, Ling-Chang Tong, Ya Li, Xin Wei, Ping Luan, Ling Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wei-Ye LiuDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhi-Bin WangDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yue WangCollege of Pharmacy, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Ling-Chang TongDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ya LiDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xin WeiDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ping LuanMedical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Ling LiDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Second Military Medical University · CNNingxia Medical University · CNShenzhen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsBlood-brain barrier (BBB) plays significant roles in the circumstance maintains for the central nervous system (CNS). The dysfunction of the BBB could occur in all pathological conditions of CNS diseases, such as ischemic stroke, cerebral edema, or inflammatory disorders. However, the comparisons among different animal models with a broken BBB in vivo are still need to be further studied.

methodsHere we used three different mice models in vivo, including MCAO induce, LPS treatment, and cold injury to mimic the situation in clinic. The permeability of BBB in three models was detected by perfusion of Evan's blue dye. The functional proteins of the BBB including claudin-5, VE-cadherin, and caveolin-1 were compared in three different models in vivo.

resultsWith the hyperpermeability of Evan's blue in the three models, both claudin-5 and VE-cadherin were decreased, while the expression of caveolin-1 was increased. Our study showed that BBB dysfunction induced by MCAO in mice was relatively stable, reliable, and moderate compared with LPS or cold injury-induced BBB permeability models, although the procedural time was generally long and operation complexity was hard. Moreover, our study also found that the model of the increased BBB permeability by cold injury was severe in the regional cerebral tissue and the model treated with LPS was mild in the global cerebral tissue. The operation of the two models in vivo was easy, quick, and stable.

conclusionThe MCAO model was the most suitable for studying the permeability of BBB among the three models in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, CDBlood-Brain BarrierCadherin 5CadherinsCaveolin 1Claudin-5Disease Models, AnimalEncephalitisEvans BlueInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryLipopolysaccharidesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPermeabilitySpinal Cord InjuriesAntigens, CDCadherin 5CadherinsCaveolin 1Claudin-5Evans BlueLipopolysaccharidesAnimal modelBlood-brain barrierTight junctionVascular permeability

Identifiers

PMID25982054
PMCPMC6495212
OpenAlexW1954825216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.