Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25981739›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2015

Peripheral blood eosinophilia and hypersensitivity reactions among patients receiving outpatient parenteral antibiotics.

Kimberly G Blumenthal, Ilan Youngster, Dustin J Rabideau, Robert A Parker, Karen S Manning, Rochelle P Walensky, Sandra B Nelson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Eosinophils and eosinophil-associated diseases: An update.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Distinguishing DRESS syndrome from drug rash and eosinophilia: Beyond RegiSCAR criteria.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of hypereosinophilia in a case ofCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly G BlumenthalDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: kblumenthal1@partners.org.
Ilan YoungsterHarvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Dustin J RabideauBiostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Robert A ParkerMedical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Karen S ManningDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Rochelle P WalenskyMedical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Sandra B NelsonHarvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (UL1)UL1TR000170 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2012 to 2013
$31.4M
Research Training in Pulmonary Immunology and Allergy at MGHT32HL116275 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI David C Christiani, ANDREW D LUSTER · 2013 to 2026
$8.6M
NCATS NIH HHS 8UL1TR000170-05NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000170NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL116275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough drug-induced peripheral eosinophilia complicates antimicrobial therapy, little is known about its frequency and implications.

objectiveWe aimed to determine the frequency and predictors of antibiotic-induced eosinophilia and subsequent hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs).

methodsWe evaluated a prospective cohort of former inpatients receiving intravenous antibiotic therapy as outpatients with at least 1 differential blood count. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying antibiotic treatment indicators to assess the effect of demographic data and antibiotic exposures on eosinophilia and subsequent HSRs, including documented rash, renal injury, and liver injury. Possible drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome cases were identified and manually validated.

resultsOf 824 patients (60% male; median age, 60 years; median therapy duration, 41 days), 210 (25%) had eosinophilia, with median peak absolute eosinophil counts of 726/mL (interquartile range, 594-990/mL). Use of vancomycin, penicillin, rifampin, and linezolid was associated with a higher hazard of having eosinophilia. There was a subsequent HSR in 64 (30%) of 210 patients with eosinophilia, including rash (n = 32), renal injury (n = 31), and liver injury (n = 13). Patients with eosinophilia were significantly more likely to have rash (hazard ratio [HR], 4.16; 95% CI, 2.54-6.83; P < .0001) and renal injury (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.36-3.33; P = .0009) but not liver injury (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.92-3.33; P = .09). Possible DRESS syndrome occurred in 7 (0.8%) of 824 patients; 4 (57%) were receiving vancomycin.

conclusionsDrug-induced eosinophilia is common with parenteral antibiotics. Although most patients with eosinophilia do not have an HSR, eosinophilia increases the hazard rate of having rash and renal injury. DRESS syndrome was more common than previously described.

Indexed as

AllergensAmbulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsBlood CirculationCohort StudiesDrug Hypersensitivity SyndromeEosinophilsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesAllergensAnti-Bacterial AgentsAllergyantibioticdrugdrug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndromeeosinophiliahypersensitivitymetronidazoleoutpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapyvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID25981739
PMCPMC4640981
OpenAlexW2158272627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.