Trial reportBMC palliative care2015
A mixed method feasibility study of a patient- and family-centred advance care planning intervention for cancer patients.
Trial report in BMC palliative care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advance care planning: A systematic review about experiences of patients with a life-threatening or life-limiting illness.Palliative medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Feasibility and acceptability of the Trans-theoretical Model-based advance care planning for community-dwelling older adults with chronic diseases in China: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Application of VIP Care in Patients with Advanced Tumors in the Western Region of China.BioMed research international · 2022Trial
- Article
- Article
- Advance care planning uptake in the severely frail.BMC palliative care · 2026Observational
- Psychometric properties of Persian version of advance care planning questionnaire among older adults in Iran.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Oncologists' perspective on advance directives, a French national prospective cross-sectional survey - the ADORE study.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning.Palliative care and social practice · 2024Article
- A model for the uptake of advance care planning in older cancer adults: a scoping review.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2022Article
- Patient-caregiver communication concordance in cancer-refinement of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in an Australian sample.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Navigating a newly diagnosed cancer through clinician-facilitated discussions of health-related patient values: a qualitative analysis.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Advance Directives in Oncology and Haematology: A Long Way to Go-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Video decision support tool promoting values conversations in advanced care planning in cancer: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.BMC palliative care · 2021Article
- How Do Patients with Life-Limiting Illness and Caregivers Want End-Of-Life Prognostic Information Delivered? A Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Patients' experiences of a mindfulness intervention for adults with advanced cancer: a qualitative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Article
- A systematic review of the use of the electronic health record for patient identification, communication, and clinical support in palliative care.JAMIA open · 2018Article
- Emotional Bond: The Nature of Relationship in Palliative Care for Cancer Patients.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is a process whereby values and goals are sensitively explored and documented to uphold patients' wishes should they become incompetent to make decisions in the future. Evidenced-based, effective approaches are needed. This study sought to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an ACP intervention informed by phase 1 findings and assessed the suitability of measures for a phase 3 trial.
methodsProspective, longitudinal, mixed methods study with convenience sampling. A skilled facilitator conducted an ACP intervention with stage III/IV cancer patients and invited caregivers. It incorporated the vignette technique and optional completion/integration of ACP documents into electronic medical records (EMR). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently, analysed separately, and the two sets of findings converged.
resultsForty-seven percent consent rate with 30 patients and 26 caregivers completing the intervention. Ninety percent of patient participants had not or probably not written future care plans. Compliance with assessments was high and missing responses to items low. Small- to medium-sized changes were observed on a number of patients and caregiver completed measures, but confidence intervals were typically wide and most included zero. An increase in distress was reported; however, all believed the intervention should be made available. Eleven documents from nine patients were incorporated into EMR. ACP may not be furthered because of intervention inadequacies, busy lives, and reluctance to plan ahead.
conclusionsIn this phase 2 study we demonstrated feasibility of recruitment and acceptability of the ACP intervention and most outcome measures. However, patient/family preferences about when and whether to document ACP components need to be respected. Thus flexibility to accommodate variability in intervention delivery, tailored to individual patient/family preferences, may be required for phase 3 research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.