Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25981642›Full record

Trial reportBMC palliative care2015

A mixed method feasibility study of a patient- and family-centred advance care planning intervention for cancer patients.

Natasha Michael, Clare O'Callaghan, Angela Baird, Karla Gough, Mei Krishnasamy, Nathaniel Hiscock, Josephine Clayton

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC palliative care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patient-caregiver communication concordance in cancer-refinement of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in an Australian sample.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Patients' experiences of a mindfulness intervention for adults with advanced cancer: a qualitative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natasha MichaelPalliative Care Service, Cabrini Health, 646 High Street, Prahran, Victoria, 3181, Australia. NMichael@cabrini.com.au.
Clare O'CallaghanPalliative Care Service, Cabrini Health, 646 High Street, Prahran, Victoria, 3181, Australia. COCallaghan@cabrini.com.au.
Angela BairdPalliative Care Service, Cabrini Health, 646 High Street, Prahran, Victoria, 3181, Australia. abaird@cabrini.com.au.
Karla GoughPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia. Karla.Gough@petermac.org.
Mei KrishnasamyPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia. meinir.krishnasamy@petermac.org.
Nathaniel HiscockFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, 3800, Australia. njhis3@student.monash.edu.
Josephine ClaytonHammondCare Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Greenwich Hospital, 97-115 River Road, Greenwich, NSW, 2065, Australia. josephine.clayton@sydney.edu.au.
St Vincent's Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is a process whereby values and goals are sensitively explored and documented to uphold patients' wishes should they become incompetent to make decisions in the future. Evidenced-based, effective approaches are needed. This study sought to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an ACP intervention informed by phase 1 findings and assessed the suitability of measures for a phase 3 trial.

methodsProspective, longitudinal, mixed methods study with convenience sampling. A skilled facilitator conducted an ACP intervention with stage III/IV cancer patients and invited caregivers. It incorporated the vignette technique and optional completion/integration of ACP documents into electronic medical records (EMR). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently, analysed separately, and the two sets of findings converged.

resultsForty-seven percent consent rate with 30 patients and 26 caregivers completing the intervention. Ninety percent of patient participants had not or probably not written future care plans. Compliance with assessments was high and missing responses to items low. Small- to medium-sized changes were observed on a number of patients and caregiver completed measures, but confidence intervals were typically wide and most included zero. An increase in distress was reported; however, all believed the intervention should be made available. Eleven documents from nine patients were incorporated into EMR. ACP may not be furthered because of intervention inadequacies, busy lives, and reluctance to plan ahead.

conclusionsIn this phase 2 study we demonstrated feasibility of recruitment and acceptability of the ACP intervention and most outcome measures. However, patient/family preferences about when and whether to document ACP components need to be respected. Thus flexibility to accommodate variability in intervention delivery, tailored to individual patient/family preferences, may be required for phase 3 research.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningFamilyNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CareTerminal CareAdultAgedCaregiversDecision MakingFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMotivation

Identifiers

PMID25981642
PMCPMC4456060
OpenAlexW1845905202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.