Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25981501›Full record

ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2015

Distinct ethanol drinking microstructures in two replicate lines of mice selected for drinking to intoxication.

A M Barkley-Levenson, J C Crabbe

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A M Barkley-LevensonDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
J C CrabbeDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

Translational measures of risk for excessive alcohol consumptionP60AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Suzanne S. Fei · 2006 to 2026
$34.5M
BIOLOGICAL BASES OF ALCOHOLISMT32AA007468 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Andrey E Ryabinin · 1987 to 2026
$11.3M
Selective Breeding for Drinking in the Circadian DarkU01AA013519 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Angela Renee Ozburn · 2001 to 2026
$10.9M
THERMAL AND METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION DURING WITHDRAWALP50AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CRABBE, JOHN C. · 1996 to 2005
$10.7M
Mouse Genetic Models for Alcohol ResearchR24AA020245 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, TAMARA J. · 2011 to 2020
$2.3M
The role of neuropeptide Y in binge-like drinking in miceF31AA022009 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BARKLEY-LEVENSON, AMANDA MALINA · 2012 to 2015
$109k
Genetic Models of AlcoholismI01BX000313 · VA · PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CRABBE, JOHN C. · 2009 to 2019
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000313NIAAA NIH HHS AA020245NIAAA NIH HHS AA10760NIAAA NIH HHS AA13519NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA022009NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS R24 AA020245NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007468NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA013519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The High Drinking in the Dark (HDID) mice have been selectively bred for reaching high blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) following the limited access Drinking in the Dark (DID) test. We have shown previously that mice from the first HDID replicate line (HDID-1) drink in larger, but not longer, ethanol drinking bouts than the low-drinking HS/Npt control mice when consuming modest amounts in the DID test. Here, we assessed drinking microstructure in HDID-1 mice during binge-like levels of ethanol intake using a lickometer system. Mice from both HDID replicates (HDID-1 and -2) and HS mice were also given three DID tests (single-bottle ethanol, two-bottle choice and single-bottle saccharin) using a continuously recording BioDAQ system to determine whether there are selection-dependent changes in drinking microstructure. Larger ethanol bout size in the HDID-1 mice than the HS mice was found to be due to a larger lick volume in these mice. HDID-1 and HDID-2 mice were also seen to have different drinking microstructures that both resulted in high intake and high BECs. The HDID-1 mice drank in larger ethanol bouts than HS, whereas HDID-2 mice drank in more frequent bouts. This pattern was also seen in two-bottle choice DID. The HDID-2 mice had a high bout frequency for all fluid types tested, whereas the large bout size phenotype of the HDID-1 mice was specific to alcohol. These findings suggest that selection for drinking to intoxication has resulted in two distinct drinking microstructures, both of which lead to high BECs and high ethanol intake.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAlcoholic IntoxicationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBinge DrinkingFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsAlcoholbinge drinkingBioDAQdrinking in the darklickometermicemicrostructurereplicate linessaccharinselective breedingtwo-bottle choice

Identifiers

PMID25981501
PMCPMC4749147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.