Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25981421›Full record

ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2015

Research for improved health: variability and impact of structural characteristics in federally funded community engaged research.

Cythina R Pearson, Bonnie Duran, John Oetzel, Maya Margarati, Malia Villegas, Julie Lucero, Nina Wallerstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Engage for Equity: A Long-Term Study of Community-Based Participatory Research and Community-Engaged Research Practices and Outcomes.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advancing Community-Based Participatory Research to Address Health Disparities in Hawai'i: Perspectives from Academic Researchers.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2019
    Article
  9. Community-Academic Partnerships to Reduce Cancer Inequities: The ChicagoCHEC Community Engagement Core.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2019
    Article
  10. Toward Health Equity: A National Study of Promising Practices in Community-Based Participatory Research.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cythina R Pearson
Bonnie Duran
John Oetzel
Maya Margarati
Malia Villegas
Julie Lucero
Nina Wallerstein

Funding

Tribal College and Universities Behavioral Wellness Project (TCU BeWell)P60MD006909 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WALTERS, KARINA LYNN · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
The ITZA Program: Indigenous HIV/AIDS Research Training 3 (IHART3) ProgramR25MH084565 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Teresa A Evans-Campbell, Michelle D Johnson-Jennings · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Enhancing CBPR Practice through Provision of Expert Information SkillsR01NR015241 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI WALLERSTEIN, NINA B · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD006909NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH084565NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough there is strong scientific, policy, and community support for community-engaged research (CEnR)-including community-based participatory research (CBPR)-the science of CEnR is still developing.

objectiveTo describe structural differences in federally funded CEnR projects by type of research (i.e., descriptive, intervention, or dissemination/policy change) and race/ethnicity of the population served.

methodsWe identified 333 federally funded projects in 2009 that potentially involved CEnR, 294 principal investigators/project directors (PI/PD) were eligible to participate in a key informant (KI) survey from late 2011 to early 2012 that asked about partnership structure (68% response rate).

resultsThe National Institute on Minority Health & Health Disparities (19.1%), National Cancer Institute (NCI; 13.3%), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; 12.6%) funded the most CEnR projects. Most were intervention projects (66.0%). Projects serving American Indian or Alaskan Native (AIAN) populations (compared with other community of color or multiple-race/unspecified) were likely to be descriptive projects (p<.01), receive less funding (p<.05), and have higher rates of written partnership agreements (p<.05), research integrity training (p<.05), approval of publications (p<.01), and data ownership (p<.01). AIAN-serving projects also reported similar rates of research productivity and greater levels of resource sharing compared with those serving multiple-race/unspecified groups.

conclusionsThere is clear variability in the structure of CEnR projects with future research needed to determine the impact of this variability on partnering processes and outcomes. In addition, projects in AIAN communities receive lower levels of funding yet still have comparable research productivity to those projects in other racial/ethnic communities.

Indexed as

Financing, GovernmentHealth PromotionCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCross-Sectional StudiesFocus GroupsHealth Status DisparitiesHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25981421
PMCPMC4804466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.