Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25981409›Full record

ReviewClinical neuroradiology2015

Functional MRI of the Brainstem: Common Problems and their Solutions.

F Beissner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structure-function coupling in the human brainstem.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pontine Functional Connectivity Gradients.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Thalamic involvement defines distinct slow-wave subtypes in NREM sleep.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Subcortical contributions to the sense of body ownership.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

F BeissnerSomatosensory and Autonomic Therapy Research, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. Beissner.florian@mh-hannover.de.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brainstem is a relatively young field that is rapidly evolving. While it is still difficult to obtain usable fMRI signals from this complicated brain region, the past few years have seen a number of important advances that bring us closer to routine application of this method in the clinical and scientific setting. This review gives an overview of the technical capabilities and limitations of brainstem fMRI. It explains the major brainstem-specific problems and gives advice on how to avoid or counteract them. In particular, I discuss how spatial resolution issues can be overcome by using appropriate sequences, coils, and spatial preprocessing, how the effects of physiological noise can be mitigated by noise modeling and spatial masking, and how the functional heterogeneity of brainstem nuclei needs to be taken into account, when planning a study. Solving these common problems is a prerequisite for any scientist or clinician interested in applying fMRI to measure brainstem activity.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainBrain DiseasesBrain MappingHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingBOLDBrainstemFunctional magnetic resonance imagingMasked ICAPhysiological noise

Identifiers

PMID25981409
OpenAlexW2100619682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.