Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25981399›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2015

Changes in receptivity epithelial cell markers of endometrium after ovarian stimulation treatments: its role during implantation window.

Francisco J Valdez-Morales, Armando Gamboa-Domínguez, Victor S Vital-Reyes, Juan C Hinojosa Cruz, Jesús Chimal-Monroy, Yanira Franco-Murillo, Marco Cerbón

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MicroRNAs, endometrial receptivity and molecular pathways.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Expression of E-Cadherin in Pig-Tailed Monkey (BioMed research international · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Correlation of IL-1 and HB-EGF with endometrial receptivity.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco J Valdez-MoralesUnidad de Investigación en Reproducción Humana, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología-Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., Mexico. franciscojavier.valdez@gmail.com.
Armando Gamboa-DomínguezDepartamento de Patología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México, D.F., Mexico. agamboad@gmail.com.
Victor S Vital-ReyesDepartamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Hospital de Ginecología y Obstetricia # 3, Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México, D.F., Mexico. victor.vital@imss.gob.mx.
Juan C Hinojosa CruzDepartamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Hospital de Ginecología y Obstetricia # 3, Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México, D.F., Mexico. juan.hinojosa@imss.gob.mx.
Jesús Chimal-MonroyDepartamento de Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, México, D.F., Mexico. jchimal@unam.mx.
Yanira Franco-MurilloUnidad de Investigación en Reproducción Humana, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología-Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., Mexico. yanitsomo@hotmail.com.
Marco CerbónUnidad de Investigación en Reproducción Humana, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología-Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., Mexico. mcerbon85@yahoo.com.mx.
Instituto Nacional de Perinatología · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MXInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the expression of receptivity markers in epithelial and stromal cells in the endometrium of ovulatory women and infertile with hypothalamic pituitary dysfunction (HPD), untreated or treated with clomiphene citrate (CC), or with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH).

methodsTwelve control ovulatory and 32 anovulatory women, 22 of whom received ovulation induction with CC (n = 12) or rFSH (n = 10). Endometrial biopsies were obtained during the mid-secretory phase. Hormonal secretion was measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay, endometrial dating and cellular expression and distribution of receptivity proteins were evaluated by quantitative immunohistochemistry.

resultsCC or rFSH treatments, modified the expression of epithelial receptivity markers, such as Glycodelin A, beta-catenin, CD166/ALCAM and IGF-1R, but not in stromal markers. Also, a change in their cell distribution was observed.

conclusionsTreatment of infertile women with HPD modified the expression and distribution of receptivity markers in the mid-secretory phase of the endometrium in epithelial but not stromal cells, which can help to explain changes in the receptivity of the endometrium during treatments and suggest an important role of these cells in the receptivity window.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesClomipheneEmbryo ImplantationEndometriumEpithelial CellsFemaleFertility Agents, FemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypothalamusImmunoenzyme TechniquesInfertility, FemaleOvulation InductionBiomarkersClomipheneFertility Agents, FemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25981399
PMCPMC4443517
OpenAlexW2131961392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.