ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2015
Intra-arterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a golden age.
Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management and Prognosis of Acute Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Review
- Neural stem cell therapies and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.Progress in neurobiology · 2019Review
- Real-time MRI for precise and predictable intra-arterial stem cell delivery to the central nervous system.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017Article
- Management of the Interventional Stroke Patient.Current treatment options in neurology · 2015Article
- Monitored Anesthesia Care for the Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient with End-stage Pulmonary Disease.Anesthesia, essays and researchesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementWith the recent publication of multiple trials demonstrating the superiority of the endovascular treatment of patients presenting with stroke from large vessel occlusion (LVO) over medical management, the emergent care of these patients is entering a new era. This realization justifies an aggressive treatment approach with these stroke patients, given the poor natural history of the disease. In general, treatment should occur as quickly as is reasonably possible. Patients with NIHSS >8 should be considered, and if <6 h from onset imaging selection achieved with CT and CTA. Those with ASPECTS >5, LVO and intermediate or good collaterals should be treated emergently. For patients with clinical deficits presenting in later timeframes MRI should be used to define core infarct size and therefore treatment eligibility. MRI might also be considered for the workup of stroke patients in centers that can offer it rapidly. Recanalization should be attempted with a stentriever or using a direct aspiration technique, with the patient under conscious sedation rather than general anesthesia, if that is a safe option. Angiographically, the goal is reperfusion of mTICI 2b/3. Post-procedure, the patient should be admitted to an intensive care setting and assessed for inpatient rehabilitation placement as soon as stable. Continuous institutional process improvement ensures that optimization of treatment times and logistics is an ongoing endeavor. Finally, patient outcomes should be assessed at three months, most commonly using the modified Rankin score.
Identifiers
25981389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.