Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25981386›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Mutual exclusion of Asaia and Wolbachia in the reproductive organs of mosquito vectors.

Paolo Rossi, Irene Ricci, Alessia Cappelli, Claudia Damiani, Ulisse Ulissi, Maria Vittoria Mancini, Matteo Valzano, Aida Capone, Sara Epis, Elena Crotti and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Molecular screening forFrontiers in microbiomes · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microbial gatekeepers: midgut bacteria inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Mosquito Gut Microbiota: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Paolo RossiScuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Camerino, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. paolo.rossi@unicam.it.
Irene RicciScuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Camerino, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. irene.ricci@unicam.it.
Alessia CappelliScuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Camerino, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. alessia.cappelli@unicam.it.
Claudia DamianiScuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Camerino, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. claudia.damiani@unicam.it.
Ulisse UlissiScuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Camerino, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. ulisse.ulissi@unicam.it.
Maria Vittoria ManciniScuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Camerino, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. mariavittoria.mancini@unicam.it.
Matteo ValzanoScuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Camerino, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. matteo.valzano@unicam.it.
Aida CaponeScuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Camerino, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. aida.capone@unicam.it.
Sara EpisDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie e Sanità Pubblica, DIVET, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. sara.epis@guest.unimi.it.
Elena CrottiDipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti la Nutrizione e l'Ambiente, DeFENS, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. elena.crotti@unimi.it.
Bessem ChouaiaDipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti la Nutrizione e l'Ambiente, DeFENS, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. bessem.chouaia@unimi.it.
Patrizia ScuppaScuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Camerino, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. patrizia.scuppa@unicam.it.
Deepak JoshiDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetic, Michigan State University, Michigan, USA. djoshi@msu.edu.
Zhiyong XiDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetic, Michigan State University, Michigan, USA. xizy@msu.edu.
Mauro MandrioliDipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. mauro.mandrioli@unimore.it.
Luciano SacchiDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "L. Spallanzani", Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy. luciano.sacchi@unipv.it.
Scott L O'NeillSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia. scott.oneill@monash.edu.
Guido FaviaScuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Camerino, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. guido.favia@unicam.it.
Università di Camerino · ITUniversity of Milan · ITMichigan State University · USMonash University · AUUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWolbachia is a group of intracellular maternally inherited bacteria infecting a high number of arthropod species. Their presence in different mosquito species has been largely described, but Aedes aegypti, the main vector of Dengue virus, has never been found naturally infected by Wolbachia. Similarly, malaria vectors and other anophelines are normally negative to Wolbachia, with the exception of an African population where these bacteria have recently been detected. Asaia is an acetic acid bacterium stably associated with several mosquito species, found as a dominant microorganism of the mosquito microbiota. Asaia has been described in gut, salivary glands and in reproductive organs of adult mosquitoes in Ae. aegypti and in anophelines. It has recently been shown that Asaia may impede vertical transmission of Wolbachia in Anopheles mosquitoes. Here we present an experimental study, aimed at determining whether there is a negative interference between Asaia and Wolbachia, for the gonad niche in mosquitoes.

methodsDifferent methods (PCR and qPCR, monoclonal antibody staining and FISH) have been used to address the question of the co-localization and the relative presence/abundance of the two symbionts. PCR and qPCR were performed to qualitatively and quantitatively verify the distribution of Asaia and Wolbachia in different mosquito species/organs. Monoclonal antibody staining and FISH were performed to localize the symbionts in different mosquito species.

resultsHere we provide evidence that, in Anopheles and in other mosquitoes, there is a reciprocal negative interference between Asaia and Wolbachia symbionts, in terms of the colonization of the gonads. In particular, we have shown that in some mosquito species the presence of one of the symbionts prevented the establishment of the second, while in other systems the symbionts were co-localized, although at reduced densities.

conclusionsA mutual exclusion or a competition between Asaia and Wolbachia may contribute to explain the inability of Wolbachia to colonize the female reproductive organs of anophelines, inhibiting its vertical transmission and explaining the absence of Wolbachia infection in Ae. aegypti and in the majority of natural populations of Anopheles mosquitoes.

Indexed as

AedesAlphaproteobacteriaAnimalsAnophelesFemaleGastrointestinal TractGonadsMaleWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID25981386
PMCPMC4445530
OpenAlexW1602473171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.