Life course research: new opportunities for establishing social and biological plausibility.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Social support and frailty progression in community-dwelling older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2024
   Article
2. Early-life inequalities and biological ageing: a multisystem Biological Health Score approach inJournal of epidemiology and community health · 2019
   Article
3. Micro, macro, but what about meso? The institutional context of health inequalities.International journal of public health · 2018
   Article
4. The role of the early social environment on Epstein Barr virus infection: a prospective observational design using the Millennium Cohort Study.Epidemiology and infection · 2017
   Observational

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as