Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25979994›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2015

Biochemical Large-Scale Interaction Analysis of Murine Olfactory Receptors and Associated Signaling Proteins with Post-Synaptic Density 95, Drosophila Discs Large, Zona-Occludens 1 (PDZ) Domains.

Fabian Jansen, Benjamin Kalbe, Paul Scholz, Benjamin Fränzel, Markus Osterloh, Dirk Wolters, Hanns Hatt, Eva Maria Neuhaus, Sabrina Osterloh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hippo Signaling in Cancer: Lessons FromFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabian JansenFrom the ‡Department of Cell Physiology, Faculty for Biology and Biotechnology.
Benjamin KalbeFrom the ‡Department of Cell Physiology, Faculty for Biology and Biotechnology.
Paul ScholzFrom the ‡Department of Cell Physiology, Faculty for Biology and Biotechnology.
Benjamin Fränzel§Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany;
Markus OsterlohFrom the ‡Department of Cell Physiology, Faculty for Biology and Biotechnology.
Dirk Wolters§Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany;
Hanns HattFrom the ‡Department of Cell Physiology, Faculty for Biology and Biotechnology.
Eva Maria Neuhaus¶Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Clinic Jena.
Sabrina OsterlohFrom the ‡Department of Cell Physiology, Faculty for Biology and Biotechnology, Sabrina.Baumgart@rub.de.
Ruhr University Bochum · DEInstitute of Pharmacology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family among mammalian membrane proteins and are capable of initiating numerous essential signaling cascades. Various GPCR-mediated pathways are organized into protein microdomains that can be orchestrated and regulated through scaffolding proteins, such as PSD-95/discs-large/ZO1 (PDZ) domain proteins. However, detailed binding characteristics of PDZ-GPCR interactions remain elusive because these interactions seem to be more complex than previously thought. To address this issue, we analyzed binding modalities using our established model system. This system includes the 13 individual PDZ domains of the multiple PDZ domain protein 1 (MUPP1; the largest PDZ protein), a broad range of murine olfactory receptors (a multifaceted gene cluster within the family of GPCRs), and associated olfactory signaling proteins. These proteins were analyzed in a large-scale peptide microarray approach and continuative interaction studies. As a result, we demonstrate that canonical binding motifs were not overrepresented among the interaction partners of MUPP1. Furthermore, C-terminal phosphorylation and distinct amino acid replacements abolished PDZ binding promiscuity. In addition to the described in vitro experiments, we identified new interaction partners within the murine olfactory epithelium using pull-down-based interactomics and could verify the partners through co-immunoprecipitation. In summary, the present study provides important insight into the complexity of the binding characteristics of PDZ-GPCR interactions based on olfactory signaling proteins, which could identify novel clinical targets for GPCR-associated diseases in the future.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MappingSignal TransductionAnimalsCarrier ProteinsMass SpectrometryMembrane ProteinsMice, TransgenicPeptidesPhosphorylationProtein Array AnalysisProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryProteomicsReceptors, OdorantCarrier ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMpdz protein, mousePeptidesReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID25979994
PMCPMC4528238
OpenAlexW2217826818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.