ReviewLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2015
Outcome learning, outcome expectations, and intentionality in Drosophila.
Review in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The exploration of consciousness in insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- A heuristic underlies the search for relief in Drosophila melanogaster.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022Article
- Loss of p21-activated kinase Mbt/PAK4 causes Parkinson-like phenotypes in Drosophila.Disease models & mechanisms · 2021Article
- Perceptual rivalry across animal species.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2020Review
- Place learning overrides innate behaviors inLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- Does Cognition Have a Role in Plasticity of "Innate Behavior"? A Perspective FromFrontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Discrete Serotonin Systems Mediate Memory Enhancement and Escape Latencies after Unpredicted Aversive Experience inFrontiers in systems neuroscience · 2017Article
- Neural control and precision of flight muscle activation in Drosophila.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2017Review
- Internal states drive nutrient homeostasis by modulating exploration-exploitation trade-off.eLife · 2016Article
- Visual Attention in Flies-Dopamine in the Mushroom Bodies Mediates the After-Effect of Cueing.PloS one · 2016Article
- Inescapable Stress Changes Walking Behavior in Flies - Learned Helplessness Revisited.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An animal generates behavioral actions because of the effects of these actions in the future. Occasionally, the animal may generate an action in response to a certain event or situation. If the outcome of the action is adaptive, the animal may keep this stimulus-response link in its behavioral repertoire, in case the event or situation occurs again. If a responsive action is innate but the outcome happens to be less adaptive than it had been before, the link may be loosened. This adjustment of outcome expectations involves a particular kind of learning, which will be called "outcome learning." The present article discusses several examples of outcome learning in Drosophila. Learning and memory are intensely studied in flies, but the focus is on classical conditioning. Outcome learning, a particular form of operant learning, is of special significance, because it modulates outcome expectations that are operational components of action selection and intentionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.