Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25979941›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 and nitrogen fixation by an endosymbiotic spirochete of a termite-gut cellulolytic protist.

Moriya Ohkuma, Satoko Noda, Satoshi Hattori, Toshiya Iida, Masahiro Yuki, David Starns, Jun-ichi Inoue, Alistair C Darby, Yuichi Hongoh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Discovery and genomics of HISME communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparative Analysis ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Moriya OhkumaJapan Collection of Microorganisms/Microbe Division, RIKEN BioResource Center, and Biomass Research Platform Team, RIKEN Biomass Engineering Program Cooperation Division, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan; mohkuma@riken.jp.
Satoko NodaJapan Collection of Microorganisms/Microbe Division, RIKEN BioResource Center, and Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 400-8511, Japan;
Satoshi HattoriDepartment of Food, Life, and Environmental Sciences, Yamagata University, Yamagata 997-8555, Japan;
Toshiya IidaJapan Collection of Microorganisms/Microbe Division, RIKEN BioResource Center, and.
Masahiro YukiBiomass Research Platform Team, RIKEN Biomass Engineering Program Cooperation Division, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan;
David StarnsJapan Collection of Microorganisms/Microbe Division, RIKEN BioResource Center, and Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom; and.
Jun-ichi InoueJapan Collection of Microorganisms/Microbe Division, RIKEN BioResource Center, and.
Alistair C DarbyInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom; and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3786-6209
Yuichi HongohJapan Collection of Microorganisms/Microbe Division, RIKEN BioResource Center, and Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan.
RIKEN BioResource Research Center · JPUniversity of Liverpool · GBRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science · JPTokyo Institute of Technology · JPYamagata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbiotic associations of cellulolytic eukaryotic protists and diverse bacteria are common in the gut microbial communities of termites. Besides cellulose degradation by the gut protists, reductive acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 and nitrogen fixation by gut bacteria play crucial roles in the host termites' nutrition by contributing to the energy demand of termites and supplying nitrogen poor in their diet, respectively. Fractionation of these activities and the identification of key genes from the gut community of the wood-feeding termite Hodotermopsis sjoestedti revealed that substantial activities in the gut--nearly 60% of reductive acetogenesis and almost exclusively for nitrogen fixation--were uniquely attributed to the endosymbiotic bacteria of the cellulolytic protist in the genus Eucomonympha. The rod-shaped endosymbionts were surprisingly identified as a spirochete species in the genus Treponema, which usually exhibits a characteristic spiral morphology. The endosymbionts likely use H2 produced by the protist for these dual functions. Although H2 is known to inhibit nitrogen fixation in some bacteria, it seemed to rather stimulate this important mutualistic process. In addition, the single-cell genome analyses revealed the endosymbiont's potentials of the utilization of sugars for its energy requirement, and of the biosynthesis of valuable nutrients such as amino acids from the fixed nitrogen. These metabolic interactions are suitable for the dual functions of the endosymbiont and reconcile its substantial contributions in the gut.

Indexed as

Nitrogen FixationSymbiosisAcetic AcidAnimalsCarbon DioxideEvolution, MolecularGenomeIntestinesIsopteraMolecular Sequence DataNitrogenPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpirochaetalesAcetic AcidCarbon DioxideNitrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sadaptive evolutionendosymbiosismetabolic interactionsingle-cell genomicsspirochetes

Identifiers

PMID25979941
PMCPMC4547241
OpenAlexW2112362775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.