Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25979940›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Classical conditioning of analgesic and hyperalgesic pain responses without conscious awareness.

Karin Jensen, Irving Kirsch, Sara Odmalm, Ted J Kaptchuk, Martin Ingvar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Domain-General Neural Effects of Associative Learning and Expectations on Pain and Hedonic Taste Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Placebo Effect in Psychosis: Why It Matters and How to Measure It.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karin JensenProgram in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215; Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden karin.jensen@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2521-3160
Irving KirschProgram in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215;
Sara OdmalmOsher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
Ted J KaptchukProgram in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215;
Martin IngvarOsher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Mentoring and Research in Placebo Studies, Asian Medicine, and CAMK24AT004095 · NCCIH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KAPTCHUK, TED · 2007 to 2016
$1.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS 2K24 AT004096NCCIH NIH HHS K24 AT004095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain reduction and enhancement can be produced by means of conditioning procedures, yet the role of awareness during the acquisition stage of classical conditioning is unknown. We used psychophysical measures to establish whether conditioned analgesic and hyperalgesic responses could be acquired by unseen (subliminally presented) stimuli. A 2 × 2 factorial design, including subliminal/supraliminal exposures of conditioning stimuli (CS) during acquisition/extinction, was used. Results showed significant analgesic and hyperalgesic responses (P < 0.001), and responses were independent of CS awareness, as subliminal/supraliminal cues during acquisition/extinction led to comparable outcomes. The effect was significantly larger for hyperalgesic than analgesic responses (P < 0.001). Results demonstrate that conscious awareness of the CS is not required during either acquisition or extinction of conditioned analgesia or hyperalgesia. Our results support the notion that nonconscious stimuli have a pervasive effect on human brain function and behavior and may affect learning of complex cognitive processes such as psychologically mediated analgesic and hyperalgesic responses.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAwarenessConditioning, ClassicalHyperalgesiaHumansPainawarenessclassical conditioningconsciousnessnoceboplacebo

Identifiers

PMID25979940
PMCPMC4485119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.