Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25979752›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

Metagenome Skimming of Insect Specimen Pools: Potential for Comparative Genomics.

Benjamin Linard, Alex Crampton-Platt, Conrad P D T Gillett, Martijn J T N Timmermans, Alfried P Vogler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin LinardDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
Alex Crampton-PlattDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, United Kingdom.
Conrad P D T GillettDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
Martijn J T N TimmermansDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot, United Kingdom.
Alfried P VoglerDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot, United Kingdom a.vogler@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomic analyses are challenging in metazoans, but high-copy number and repeat regions can be assembled from low-coverage sequencing by "genome skimming," which is applied here as a new way of characterizing metagenomes obtained in an ecological or taxonomic context. Illumina shotgun sequencing on two pools of Coleoptera (beetles) of approximately 200 species each were assembled into tens of thousands of scaffolds. Repeated low-coverage sequencing recovered similar scaffold sets consistently, although approximately 70% of scaffolds could not be identified against existing genome databases. Identifiable scaffolds included mitochondrial DNA, conserved sequences with hits to expressed sequence tag and protein databases, and known repeat elements of high and low complexity, including numerous copies of rRNA and histone genes. Assemblies of histones captured a diversity of gene order and primary sequence in Coleoptera. Scaffolds with similarity to multiple sites in available coleopteran genome sequences for Dendroctonus and Tribolium revealed high specificity of scaffolds to either of these genomes, in particular for high-copy number repeats. Numerous "clusters" of scaffolds mapped to the same genomic site revealed intra- and/or intergenomic variation within a metagenome pool. In addition to effect of taxonomic composition of the metagenomes, the number of mapped scaffolds also revealed structural differences between the two reference genomes, although the significance of this striking finding remains unclear. Finally, apparently exogenous sequences were recovered, including potential food plants, fungal pathogens, and bacterial symbionts. The "metagenome skimming" approach is useful for capturing the genomic diversity of poorly studied, species-rich lineages and opens new prospects in environmental genomics.

Indexed as

MetagenomeAnimalsBacteriaColeopteraDNADNA, PlantGene LibraryGenomicsHistonesMetagenomicsMultigene FamilyPhylogenyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNADNA, PlantHistonesbacterial endosymbiontsColeopteraenvironmental genomicsgenome evolutionhistone genesrepetitive DNA

Identifiers

PMID25979752
PMCPMC4494052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.