Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25979343›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2015

Probing the Solution Structure of IκB Kinase (IKK) Subunit γ and Its Interaction with Kaposi Sarcoma-associated Herpes Virus Flice-interacting Protein and IKK Subunit β by EPR Spectroscopy.

Claire Bagnéris, Kacper B Rogala, Mehdi Baratchian, Vlad Zamfir, Micha B A Kunze, Selina Dagless, Katharina F Pirker, Mary K Collins, Benjamin A Hall, Tracey E Barrett and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. (S)Pinning down protein interactions by NMR.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Claire BagnérisFrom the Department of Biological Sciences, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom.
Kacper B RogalaFrom the Department of Biological Sciences, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Mehdi BaratchianMRC Centre for Medical Molecular Virology, UCL Cancer Institute and National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Herts EN6 3QG, United Kingdom.
Vlad ZamfirFrom the Department of Biological Sciences, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Micha B A KunzeInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Selina DaglessInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Katharina F PirkerInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Mary K CollinsMRC Centre for Medical Molecular Virology, UCL Cancer Institute and National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Herts EN6 3QG, United Kingdom.
Benjamin A HallMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, United Kingdom, and bh418@mrc-cu.cam.ac.uk.
Tracey E BarrettFrom the Department of Biological Sciences, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom, t.barrett@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk.
Christopher W M KayInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom, London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, 17-19 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AH, United Kingdom c.kay@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5200-6004
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology · GBBirkbeck, University of London · GBNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control · GBMRC Cancer Unit · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK A12595Medical Research Council ID18218Medical Research Council MC_UU_12022/9Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral flice-interacting protein (vFLIP), encoded by the oncogenic Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpes virus (KSHV), constitutively activates the canonical nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway. This is achieved through subversion of the IκB kinase (IKK) complex (or signalosome), which involves a physical interaction between vFLIP and the modulatory subunit IKKγ. Although this interaction has been examined both in vivo and in vitro, the mechanism by which vFLIP activates the kinase remains to be determined. Because IKKγ functions as a scaffold, recruiting both vFLIP and the IKKα/β subunits, it has been proposed that binding of vFLIP could trigger a structural rearrangement in IKKγ conducive to activation. To investigate this hypothesis we engineered a series of mutants along the length of the IKKγ molecule that could be individually modified with nitroxide spin labels. Subsequent distance measurements using electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy combined with molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations revealed that IKKγ is a parallel coiled-coil whose response to binding of vFLIP or IKKβ is localized twisting/stiffening and not large-scale rearrangements. The coiled-coil comprises N- and C-terminal regions with distinct registers accommodated by a twist: this structural motif is exploited by vFLIP, allowing it to bind and subsequently activate the NF-κB pathway. In vivo assays confirm that NF-κB activation by vFLIP only requires the N-terminal region up to the transition between the registers, which is located directly C-terminal of the vFLIP binding site.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsBinding SitesElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyHerpesvirus 8, HumanHumansI-kappa B KinaseProtein BindingSarcoma, KaposiViral ProteinsI-kappa B Kinaseviral FLIP protein, Human herpesvirus 8Viral Proteinselectron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)IKKγmolecular dynamicsmolecular modelingNEMONF-kappa B (NF-κB)protein structuresignalosomevFLIPvirology

Identifiers

PMID25979343
PMCPMC4505408
OpenAlexW1876894627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.