ArticleMedical physics2015
A method for volumetric imaging in radiotherapy using single x-ray projection.
Article in Medical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time Dose-Guided Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence for treatment delivery: image-guided radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Review
- TomoGRAF: An X-ray physics-driven generative radiance field framework for extremely sparse view CT reconstruction.PloS one · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal correlation enhanced real-time 4D-CBCT imaging using convolutional LSTM networks.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- [Risk-minimizing tube current modulation for computed tomography].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Incorporating the synthetic CT image for improving the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and cone-beam CT.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Two-stage deep learning network-based few-view image reconstruction for parallel-beam projection tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Reconstruction of three-dimensional tomographic patient models for radiation dose modulation in CT from two scout views using deep learning.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Deep learning-based real-time volumetric imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy: a proof of concept study.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- A statistical weighted sparse-based local lung motion modelling approach for model-driven lung biopsy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020Article
- Patient-specific reconstruction of volumetric computed tomography images from a single projection view via deep learning.Nature biomedical engineering · 2019Article
- A new scheme for real-time high-contrast imaging in lung cancer radiotherapy: a proof-of-concept study.Physics in medicine and biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIt is an intriguing problem to generate an instantaneous volumetric image based on the corresponding x-ray projection. The purpose of this study is to develop a new method to achieve this goal via a sparse learning approach.
methodsTo extract motion information hidden in projection images, the authors partitioned a projection image into small rectangular patches. The authors utilized a sparse learning method to automatically select patches that have a high correlation with principal component analysis (PCA) coefficients of a lung motion model. A model that maps the patch intensity to the PCA coefficients was built along with the patch selection process. Based on this model, a measured projection can be used to predict the PCA coefficients, which are then further used to generate a motion vector field and hence a volumetric image. The authors have also proposed an intensity baseline correction method based on the partitioned projection, in which the first and the second moments of pixel intensities at a patch in a simulated projection image are matched with those in a measured one via a linear transformation. The proposed method has been validated in both simulated data and real phantom data.
resultsThe algorithm is able to identify patches that contain relevant motion information such as the diaphragm region. It is found that an intensity baseline correction step is important to remove the systematic error in the motion prediction. For the simulation case, the sparse learning model reduced the prediction error for the first PCA coefficient to 5%, compared to the 10% error when sparse learning was not used, and the 95th percentile error for the predicted motion vector was reduced from 2.40 to 0.92 mm. In the phantom case with a regular tumor motion, the predicted tumor trajectory was successfully reconstructed with a 0.82 mm error for tumor center localization compared to a 1.66 mm error without using the sparse learning method. When the tumor motion was driven by a real patient breathing signal with irregular periods and amplitudes, the average tumor center error was 0.6 mm. The algorithm robustness with respect to sparsity level, patch size, and presence or absence of diaphragm, as well as computation time, has also been studied.
conclusionsThe authors have developed a new method that automatically identifies motion information from an x-ray projection, based on which a volumetric image is generated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.