Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25979043›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2015

A method for volumetric imaging in radiotherapy using single x-ray projection.

Yuan Xu, Hao Yan, Luo Ouyang, Jing Wang, Linghong Zhou, Laura Cervino, Steve B Jiang, Xun Jia

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Real-Time Dose-Guided Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Review
  2. Artificial intelligence for treatment delivery: image-guided radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A statistical weighted sparse-based local lung motion modelling approach for model-driven lung biopsy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuan XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235 and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China.
Hao YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235.
Luo OuyangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235.
Jing WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235.
Linghong ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China.
Laura CervinoCenter for Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies and Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037.
Steve B JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235.
Xun JiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235.

Funding

Low dose cone beam CT for image guided adaptive radiotherapyR01CA154747 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIANG, STEVE BIN · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
4D cone beam CT reconstruction for radiotherapy via motion vector optimizationR21EB017978 · NIBIB · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN · 2014 to 2015
$444k
A progressive cone-beam CT dose control scheme for image-guided radiation therapyR21CA178787 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN · 2014 to 2015
$380k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA154747-01NCI NIH HHS 1R21CA178787-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154747NCI NIH HHS R21 CA178787NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB017978NIBIB NIH HHS R21EB017978-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt is an intriguing problem to generate an instantaneous volumetric image based on the corresponding x-ray projection. The purpose of this study is to develop a new method to achieve this goal via a sparse learning approach.

methodsTo extract motion information hidden in projection images, the authors partitioned a projection image into small rectangular patches. The authors utilized a sparse learning method to automatically select patches that have a high correlation with principal component analysis (PCA) coefficients of a lung motion model. A model that maps the patch intensity to the PCA coefficients was built along with the patch selection process. Based on this model, a measured projection can be used to predict the PCA coefficients, which are then further used to generate a motion vector field and hence a volumetric image. The authors have also proposed an intensity baseline correction method based on the partitioned projection, in which the first and the second moments of pixel intensities at a patch in a simulated projection image are matched with those in a measured one via a linear transformation. The proposed method has been validated in both simulated data and real phantom data.

resultsThe algorithm is able to identify patches that contain relevant motion information such as the diaphragm region. It is found that an intensity baseline correction step is important to remove the systematic error in the motion prediction. For the simulation case, the sparse learning model reduced the prediction error for the first PCA coefficient to 5%, compared to the 10% error when sparse learning was not used, and the 95th percentile error for the predicted motion vector was reduced from 2.40 to 0.92 mm. In the phantom case with a regular tumor motion, the predicted tumor trajectory was successfully reconstructed with a 0.82 mm error for tumor center localization compared to a 1.66 mm error without using the sparse learning method. When the tumor motion was driven by a real patient breathing signal with irregular periods and amplitudes, the average tumor center error was 0.6 mm. The algorithm robustness with respect to sparsity level, patch size, and presence or absence of diaphragm, as well as computation time, has also been studied.

conclusionsThe authors have developed a new method that automatically identifies motion information from an x-ray projection, based on which a volumetric image is generated.

Indexed as

Machine LearningDiaphragmFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansLungLung NeoplasmsModels, BiologicalMotionPhantoms, ImagingPrincipal Component AnalysisRadiotherapyRespirationTime FactorsX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID25979043
PMCPMC4409629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.