Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25978820›Full record

Trial reportJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2015

Personalized drinking feedback intervention for veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan: a randomized controlled trial.

Matthew P Martens, Jennifer M Cadigan, Randall E Rogers, Zachary H Osborn

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Young adult veteran perceptions of peers' drinking behavior and attitudes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew P MartensDepartment of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Jennifer M CadiganDepartment of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Randall E RogersHarry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, Missouri.
Zachary H OsbornHarry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, Missouri.
Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Personalized Drinking Feedback Interventions for OEF/OIF VeteransR21AA020180 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI MARTENS, MATTHEW P · 2010 to 2011
$387k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA020180NIAAA NIH HHS R21AA020180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearch has shown that U.S. military veterans are at risk relative to the general adult population for excessive alcohol consumption, and veterans of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (Operation Enduring Freedom [OEF], Operation Iraqi Freedom [OIF], and Operation New Dawn [OND]) particularly so. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of a brief personalized drinking feedback intervention tailored for veterans.

methodAll veterans who presented to the OEF/OIF/OND Seamless Transition Clinic at the Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital (Columbia, MO) were eligible to participate. Participants were 325 veterans (93% male; 82% White, 75% Army, M(age) = 32.20 years) who were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: personalized drinking feedback (PDF) or educational information (EDU). Those in the PDF condition received personalized information about their alcohol use, including social norms comparisons, risks associated with reported drinking levels, and a summary of their alcohol-related problems. Follow-up assessments were completed at 1 and 6 months after intervention (response rates = 93% and 86%, respectively).

resultsResults indicated a significant (p < .05) Omnibus Group × Time effect for estimated peak blood alcohol concentration, although tests of simple main effects did not indicate between-group differences at the individual follow-up points. Among baseline abstainers, those in the PDF condition were more likely than those in the EDU condition to remain an abstainer at 6-month follow-up (p < .05).

conclusionsThese findings provide preliminary support for the efficacy of a brief, inexpensive alcohol prevention/intervention for young adult military veterans.

Indexed as

VeteransAdultAfghan Campaign 2001-Alcohol DrinkingCounselingFemaleHospitals, VeteransHumansIraq War, 2003-2011MaleUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25978820
PMCPMC4440294
OpenAlexW1944710661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.