Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25978707›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2015

Advances in molecular genetic systems in malaria.

Tania F de Koning-Ward, Paul R Gilson, Brendan S Crabb

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Methods Used to Investigate theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  13. How Malaria Parasites Acquire Nutrients From Their Host.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Genome Editing ofmSphere · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tania F de Koning-WardDeakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Paul R Gilson1] Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia. [2] Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Brendan S Crabb1] Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia. [2] Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia. [3] The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Burnet Institute · AUDeakin University · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust tools for analysing gene function in Plasmodium parasites, which are the causative agents of malaria, are being developed at an accelerating rate. Two decades after genetic technologies for use in Plasmodium spp. were first described, a range of genetic tools are now available. These include conditional systems that can regulate gene expression at the genome, transcriptional or protein level, as well as more sophisticated tools for gene editing that use piggyBac transposases, integrases, zinc-finger nucleases or the CRISPR-Cas9 system. In this Review, we discuss the molecular genetic systems that are currently available for use in Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium berghei, and evaluate the advantages and limitations of these tools. We examine the insights that have been gained into the function of genes that are important during the blood stages of the parasites, which may help to guide the development and improvement of drug therapies and vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsGenome, ProtozoanHumansMalariaMolecular BiologyPlasmodium bergheiPlasmodium falciparum

Identifiers

PMID25978707
OpenAlexW1490272169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.