Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25978484›Full record

ReviewJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2015

Biomedical HIV Prevention Including Pre-exposure Prophylaxis and Opiate Agonist Therapy for Women Who Inject Drugs: State of Research and Future Directions.

Kimberly Page, Judith Tsui, Lisa Maher, Kachit Choopanya, Suphak Vanichseni, Philip A Mock, Connie Celum, Michael Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. The Effect of Female Sex on Hepatitis C Incidence Among People Who Inject Drugs: Results From the International Multicohort InC3 Collaborative.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kimberly Page*Department of Internal Medicine, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Preventive Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM; †Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; ‡Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity, UNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia; §Bangkok Tenofovir Study Group, Taksin Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand; ‖HIV Clinical Research, Thailand MOPH, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand; ¶Department of Global Health and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and #HIV Clinical Research, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Judith Tsui
Lisa Maher
Kachit Choopanya
Suphak Vanichseni
Philip A Mock
Connie Celum
Michael Martin
University of Washington · USBangkok Hospital · THDepartment of Disease Control · THInstitute of Infection and Immunity · CAUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Acute Hepatitis C Infection in Young InjectorsR01DA016017 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI PAGE, KIMBERLY · 2002 to 2018
$14.0M
International Collaborative of prospective studies of HIV and Hepatitis in IDUR01DA031056 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI PAGE, KIMBERLY · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016017NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women who inject drugs (WWID) are at higher risk of HIV compared with their male counterparts as a result of multiple factors, including biological, behavioral, and sociostructural factors, yet comparatively little effort has been invested in testing and delivering prevention methods that directly target this group. In this article, we discuss the need for expanded prevention interventions for WWID, focusing on 2 safe, effective, and approved, yet underutilized biomedical prevention methods: opiate agonist therapy (OAT) and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Although both interventions are well researched, they have not been well examined in the context of gender. We discuss the drivers of women injectors' higher HIV risk, review the effectiveness of OAT and PrEP interventions among women, and explain why these new HIV prevention tools should be prioritized for WWID. There is substantial potential for impact of OAT and PrEP programs for WWID in the context of broader gender-responsive HIV prevention initiatives. Although awaiting efficacy data on other biomedical approaches in the HIV prevention research "pipeline," we propose that the scale-up and implementation of these proven, safe, and effective interventions are needed now.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansNational Health ProgramsOpioid-Related DisordersPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSubstance Abuse, IntravenousWomen's Health ServicesAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID25978484
PMCPMC4491435
OpenAlexW234525111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.