Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25978463›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Intraperitoneal Transcriptome of the Opportunistic Pathogen Enterococcus faecalis in Mice.

Cécile Muller, Margherita Cacaci, Nicolas Sauvageot, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Thomas Rattei, Thomas Eder, Jean-Christophe Giard, Jörn Kalinowski, Torsten Hain, Axel Hartke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Metal uptake systems underpinInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  3. Wound-Healing Potential of Engineered Lysin GRC-ML07 inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. The NagY antiterminator inMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Cécile MullerU2RM-Stress and Virulence, University of Caen Basse-Normandie, EA4655, 14032 Caen, France.
Margherita CacaciU2RM-Stress and Virulence, University of Caen Basse-Normandie, EA4655, 14032 Caen, France; Institute of Microbiology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Nicolas SauvageotU2RM-Stress and Virulence, University of Caen Basse-Normandie, EA4655, 14032 Caen, France.
Maurizio SanguinettiInstitute of Microbiology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Thomas RatteiCUBE-Division for Computational Systems Biology, Dept. of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Thomas EderCUBE-Division for Computational Systems Biology, Dept. of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Jean-Christophe GiardU2RM-Stress and Virulence, University of Caen Basse-Normandie, EA4655, 14032 Caen, France.
Jörn KalinowskiCenter for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, 33594 Bielefeld, Germany.
Torsten HainInstitute of Medicine Microbiology, Gießen University, 35392 Gießen, Germany.
Axel HartkeU2RM-Stress and Virulence, University of Caen Basse-Normandie, EA4655, 14032 Caen, France.
Université de Caen Normandie · FRUniversity of Vienna · ATBielefeld University · DEUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococcus faecalis is a Gram-positive lactic acid intestinal opportunistic bacterium with virulence potential. For a better understanding of the adapation of this bacterium to the host conditions, we performed a transcriptome analysis of bacteria isolated from an infection site (mouse peritonitis) by RNA-sequencing. We identified a total of 211 genes with significantly higher transcript levels and 157 repressed genes. Our in vivo gene expression database reflects well the infection process since genes encoding important virulence factors like cytolysin, gelatinase or aggregation substance as well as stress response proteins, are significantly induced. Genes encoding metabolic activities are the second most abundant in vivo induced genes demonstrating that the bacteria are metabolically active and adapt to the special nutrient conditions of the host. α- and β- glucosides seem to be important substrates for E. faecalis inside the host. Compared to laboratory conditions, the flux through the upper part of glycolysis seems to be reduced and more carbon may enter the pentose phosphate pathway. This may reflect the need of the bacteria under infection conditions to produce more reducing power for biosynthesis. Another important substrate is certainly glycerol since both pathways of glycerol catabolism are strongly induced. Strongly in vivo induced genes should be important for the infection process. This assumption has been verified in a virulence test using well characterized mutants affected in glycerol metabolism. This showed indeed that mutants unable to metabolize this sugar alcohol are affected in organ colonisation in a mouse model.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnterococcus faecalisGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, BacterialGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, BacterialTranscriptomeRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID25978463
PMCPMC4433114
OpenAlexW1781996060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.