Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25978337›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2015

Dichotomous "Good Outcome" Indicates Mobility More Than Cognitive or Social Quality of Life.

Andrew M Naidech, Jennifer L Beaumont, Michael Berman, Brandon Francis, Eric Liotta, Matthew B Maas, Shyam Prabhakaran, Jane Holl, David Cella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Timing of neuroprognostication in the ICU.Current opinion in critical care · 2025
    Review
  4. Outcomes Measures in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research.Translational stroke research · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prognostication after intracerebral hemorrhage: a review.Neurological research and practice · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Effects of Hypoxic and Ischemic Clinical Conditions on the Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Improving the Accuracy of Scores to Predict Gastrostomy after Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Machine Learning.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Refining Prognosis for Intracerebral Hemorrhage by Early Reassessment.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew M Naidech1Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. 2Departent of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. 3Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Jennifer L Beaumont
Michael Berman
Brandon Francis
Eric Liotta
Matthew B Maas
Shyam Prabhakaran
Jane Holl
David Cella
Northwestern University · US

Funding

NINDS NIH HHS HHSN271201200036CPHS HHS U54ARD57951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWorthwhile interventions for intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage generally hinge on whether they improve the odds of good outcome. Although good outcome is correlated with mobility, correlations with other domains of health-related quality of life, such as cognitive function and social functioning, are not well described. We tested the hypothesis that good outcome is more closely associated with mobility than other domains.

designWe defined "good outcome" as 0 through 3 (independent ambulation or better) versus 4 through 5 (dependent) on the modified Rankin Scale at 1, 3, and 12 months. We simultaneously assessed the modified Rankin Scale and health-related quality of life using web-based computer adaptive testing in the domains of mobility, cognitive function (executive function and general concerns), and satisfaction with social roles and activities. We compared the area under the curve between different health-related quality of life domains.

settingNeurologic ICU with web-based follow-up. PATIENTS: One hundred fourteen patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracerebral hemorrhage.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN

resultsWe longitudinally followed 114 survivors with data at 1 month, 62 patients at 3 months, and 58 patients at 12 months. At 1 month, area under the curve was highest for mobility (0.957; 95% CI, 0.904-0.98), higher than cognitive function-general concerns (0.819; 95% CI, 0.715-0.888; p = 0.003 compared with mobility), satisfaction with social roles and activities (0.85; 95% CI, 0.753-0.911; p = 0.01 compared with mobility), and cognitive function-executive function (0.879; 95% CI, 0.782-0.935; p = 0.058 compared with mobility). Optimal specificity and sensitivity for receiver operating characteristic analysis were approximately 1.5 SD below the U.S. population mean.

conclusionsHealth-related quality of life assessments reliably distinguished between good and poor outcomes as determined by the modified Rankin Scale. Good outcome indicated health-related quality of life about 1.5 SD below the U.S. population mean. Associations were weaker for cognitive function and social function than mobility.

Indexed as

Mobility LimitationAdultAgedCerebral HemorrhageCognitionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePersonal SatisfactionQuality of LifeSubarachnoid Hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID25978337
PMCPMC4506199
OpenAlexW262315099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.