Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25977941›Full record

ReviewThe Analyst2015

A review of flux considerations for in vivo neurochemical measurements.

David W Paul, Julie A Stenken

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Analyst, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Tissue-Integrating Oxygen Sensors: Continuous Tracking of Tissue Hypoxia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David W PaulDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. dpaul@uark.edu jstenken@uark.edu.
Julie A Stenken
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

Quantitative Biocompatibility of Implanted MaterialsR01EB001441 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI STENKEN, JULIE A · 2003 to 2010
$1.9M
In Vivo Brain Dialysis of Neuropeptides and Neuroimmune Signaling ProteinsR21NS075874 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI STENKEN, JULIE A · 2011 to 2012
$375k
Neuropeptide Affinity Enrichment Microdialysis SamplingR21DA020577 · NIDA · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI STENKEN, JULIE A · 2005 to 2006
$297k
NIBIB NIH HHS EB 001441NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001441NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA020577NINDS NIH HHS NS075874NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS075874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mass transport or flux of neurochemicals in the brain and how this flux affects chemical measurements and their interpretation is reviewed. For all endogenous neurochemicals found in the brain, the flux of each of these neurochemicals exists between sources that produce them and the sites that consume them all within μm distances. Principles of convective-diffusion are reviewed with a significant emphasis on the tortuous paths and discrete point sources and sinks. The fundamentals of the primary methods of detection, microelectrodes and microdialysis sampling of brain neurochemicals are included in the review. Special attention is paid to the change in the natural flux of the neurochemicals caused by implantation and consumption at microelectrodes and uptake by microdialysis. The detection of oxygen, nitric oxide, glucose, lactate, and glutamate, and catecholamines by both methods are examined and where possible the two techniques (electrochemical vs. microdialysis) are compared. Non-invasive imaging methods: magnetic resonance, isotopic fluorine MRI, electron paramagnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography are also used for different measurements of the above-mentioned solutes and these are briefly reviewed. Although more sophisticated, the imaging techniques are unable to track neurochemical flux on short time scales, and lack spatial resolution. Where possible, determinations of flux using imaging are compared to the more classical techniques of microdialysis and microelectrodes.

Indexed as

NeurochemistryAnimalsBiological TransportBrainChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalHumans

Identifiers

PMID25977941
PMCPMC5310531
OpenAlexW1885112825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.