ArticleEJNMMI research2014
Evaluation of repeated [(18)F]EF5 PET/CT scans and tumor growth rate in experimental head and neck carcinomas.
Article in EJNMMI research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repeatability of tumour hypoxia imaging using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018Trial
- How to Modulate Tumor Hypoxia for Preclinical In Vivo Imaging Research.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2018Review
- Molecular mechanisms of hypoxia in cancer.Clinical and translational imaging · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor hypoxia is linked to invasion and metastasis but whether this associates with tumor growth rate is not well understood. We aimed to study the relationship between hypoxia evaluated with the positron emission tomography (PET) tracer [(18)F]EF5 and tumor growth. Our second goal was to assess the variability in the uptake of [(18)F]EF5 in tumor between two scans.
methodsFour human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (UT-SCC) cell lines were xenografted in flank or neck of nude mice, and tumor size was closely monitored over the study period. The tumors were clearly visible when the first [(18)F]EF5 scan was acquired. After an exponential growth phase, the tumors were imaged again with [(18)F]EF5 and also with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG).
resultsThere was a clear correlation between the percentage of tumor growth rate per day and the [(18)F]EF5 uptake in the latter scan (r = 0.766, p = 0.01). The uptake of [(18)F]EF5 in the first scan and the uptake of [(18)F]FDG did not significantly correlate with the tumor growth rate. We also observed considerable variations in the uptake of [(18)F]EF5 between the two scans.
conclusionsThe uptake of [(18)F]EF5 in the late phase of exponential tumor growth is associated with the tumor growth rate in mice bearing HNC xenografts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.