ArticleScientific data2015
A multi-subject, multi-modal human neuroimaging dataset.
Article in Scientific data, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Brain, Body, and Behavior Dataset (BBBD): Multimodal Recordings during Educational Videos.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Inferring neural sources from electroencephalography: foundations and frontiers.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Review
- Joint Bayesian Hidden Markov Model With Subject-Specific Transitions for Wearable Sensor Data.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Large-scale cortical functional networks are organized in structured cycles.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Review
- Evidence for Transient, Uncoupled Power and Functional Connectivity Dynamics.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Magnetoencephalographic source localization and reconstruction via deep learning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- osl-ephys: a Python toolbox for the analysis of electrophysiology data.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Joint estimation of source dynamics and interactions from MEG data.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Coherence-based channel selection and Riemannian geometry features for magnetoencephalography decoding.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Shared neural codes of recognition memory.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Dynamic network analysis of electrophysiological task data.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Bridging the gap between EEG and DCNNs reveals a fatigue mechanism of facial repetition suppression.iScience · 2023Article
- EEG is better left alone.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- ENIGMA HALFpipe: Interactive, reproducible, and efficient analysis for resting-state and task-based fMRI data.Human brain mapping · 2022Review
- Building FAIR Functionality: Annotating Events in Time Series Data Using Hierarchical Event Descriptors (HED).Neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Open multimodal iEEG-fMRI dataset from naturalistic stimulation with a short audiovisual film.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Editorial: From Raw MEG/EEG to Publication: How to Perform MEG/EEG Group Analysis With Free Academic Software.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Combining electro- and magnetoencephalography data using directional archetypal analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We describe data acquired with multiple functional and structural neuroimaging modalities on the same nineteen healthy volunteers. The functional data include Electroencephalography (EEG), Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data, recorded while the volunteers performed multiple runs of hundreds of trials of a simple perceptual task on pictures of familiar, unfamiliar and scrambled faces during two visits to the laboratory. The structural data include T1-weighted MPRAGE, Multi-Echo FLASH and Diffusion-weighted MR sequences. Though only from a small sample of volunteers, these data can be used to develop methods for integrating multiple modalities from multiple runs on multiple participants, with the aim of increasing the spatial and temporal resolution above that of any one modality alone. They can also be used to integrate measures of functional and structural connectivity, and as a benchmark dataset to compare results across the many neuroimaging analysis packages. The data are freely available from https://openfmri.org/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.