Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25977793›Full record

ArticleScientific data2014

DNA methylation temporal profiling following peripheral versus central nervous system axotomy.

Ricco Lindner, Radhika Puttagunta, Tuan Nguyen, Simone Di Giovanni

Open access · goldAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of Methylation Modification in Neural Injury and Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Three-dimensional chromatin mapping of sensory neurons reveals that promoter-enhancer looping is required for axonal regeneration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Advances and Limitations of Current Epigenetic Studies Investigating Mammalian Axonal Regeneration.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. In vitro models of axon regeneration.Experimental neurology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricco LindnerLaboratory for NeuroRegeneration and Repair, Center for Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen , 72076 Tuebingen, Germany ; Center for Biotechnology and Biomedicine (BBZ), Division of Molecular Biological-Biochemical Processing Technology, University of Leipzig , 04103 Germany.
Radhika PuttaguntaLaboratory for NeuroRegeneration and Repair, Center for Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen , 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Tuan NguyenLaboratory for NeuroRegeneration and Repair, Center for Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen , 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Simone Di GiovanniLaboratory for NeuroRegeneration and Repair, Center for Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen , 72076 Tuebingen, Germany ; Molecular Neuroregeneration, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus , W12 ONN, London.
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DELeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulatory mechanisms responsible for the gene expression pattern associated with axotomy-dependent signaling affecting the neuronal phenotype, including the axonal regenerative program, remain unclear. To further this understanding, we recently performed DNA methylation temporal profiling in lumbar dorsal root ganglia (DRG) after axotomy of the central spinal (non-regenerating) and of the peripheral sciatic nerve (regenerating) axonal branches. DNA methylation microarrays for mouse gene promoters and CpG islands (Roche/NimbleGen) were employed after immunoprecipitation of 5-methylcytosine-DNA. Here we provide a detailed data descriptor of this DNA methylation dataset, which allows in depth evaluation of the experimental design, assessment of data reproducibility and a full interactive operator-based systematic data analysis. In fact, we offer a methylation 'hit' scoring map of the whole microarray data in a workable spreadsheet that allows data sorting by genes, conditions or hits of interests that is ready for functional gene annotation and classification. This dataset allows investigators bioinformatic comparison to other epigenetic and gene expression datasets and further experimental characterization of the role of DNA methylation in axotomy-dependent pathways.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGanglia, SpinalSciatic NerveAnimalsAxonsAxotomyCentral Nervous SystemMice

Identifiers

PMID25977793
PMCPMC4411011
OpenAlexW2021110153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.