Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25977789›Full record

ArticleScientific data2014

Building the graph of medicine from millions of clinical narratives.

Samuel G Finlayson, Paea LePendu, Nigam H Shah

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Applications of network analysis to routinely collected health care data: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Inference of dependency knowledge graph for Electronic Health Records.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Precision Adverse Drug Reactions Prediction with Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Machine learning and deep learning in medicine and neuroimaging.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Constructing public health evidence knowledge graph for decision-making support from COVID-19 literature of modelling study.Journal of safety science and resilience = An quan ke xue yu ren xing (Ying wen) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Automated ICD coding via unsupervised knowledge integration (UNITE).International journal of medical informatics · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel G FinlaysonCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Paea LePenduCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Nigam H ShahCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, USA.

Funding

STANFORD COMPOSITE(RMI)U54HG004028 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2005 to 2014
$36.2M
Methods for generalized ontology terms enrichment analysisR01LM011369 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, NIGAM H · 2013 to 2020
$5.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028NHGRI NIH HHS U54-HG004028NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011369NLM NIH HHS R01-LM011369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHR) represent a rich and relatively untapped resource for characterizing the true nature of clinical practice and for quantifying the degree of inter-relatedness of medical entities such as drugs, diseases, procedures and devices. We provide a unique set of co-occurrence matrices, quantifying the pairwise mentions of 3 million terms mapped onto 1 million clinical concepts, calculated from the raw text of 20 million clinical notes spanning 19 years of data. Co-frequencies were computed by means of a parallelized annotation, hashing, and counting pipeline that was applied over clinical notes from Stanford Hospitals and Clinics. The co-occurrence matrix quantifies the relatedness among medical concepts which can serve as the basis for many statistical tests, and can be used to directly compute Bayesian conditional probabilities, association rules, as well as a range of test statistics such as relative risks and odds ratios. This dataset can be leveraged to quantitatively assess comorbidity, drug-drug, and drug-disease patterns for a range of clinical, epidemiological, and financial applications.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMedicineComorbidityDrug InteractionsDrug TherapyHumansRisk

Identifiers

PMID25977789
PMCPMC4322575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.