Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25977682›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biomedical imaging2015

Automatic extraction of blood vessels in the retinal vascular tree using multiscale medialness.

Mariem Ben Abdallah, Jihene Malek, Ahmad Taher Azar, Philippe Montesinos, Hafedh Belmabrouk, Julio Esclarín Monreal, Karl Krissian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biomedical imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Review on the Extraction of Quantitative Retinal Microvascular Image Feature.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2018
    Review
  2. Recent Advancements in Retinal Vessel Segmentation.Journal of medical systems · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mariem Ben AbdallahFaculty of Sciences, Electronics and Microelectronics Laboratory, Monastir University, 5019 Monastir, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-3618-211X
Jihene MalekFaculty of Sciences, Electronics and Microelectronics Laboratory, Monastir University, 5019 Monastir, Tunisia.
Ahmad Taher AzarFaculty of Computers and Information, Benha University, Benha 13511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-7869-6373
Philippe MontesinosInstitute of Mines and Ales, Laboratory of Computer and Production Engineering, 30319 Alès, France.
Hafedh BelmabroukFaculty of Sciences, Electronics and Microelectronics Laboratory, Monastir University, 5019 Monastir, Tunisia.
Julio Esclarín MonrealImaging Technology Center (CTIM), Las Palmas-Gran Canaria University, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Karl KrissianImaging Technology Center (CTIM), Las Palmas-Gran Canaria University, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose an algorithm for vessel extraction in retinal images. The first step consists of applying anisotropic diffusion filtering in the initial vessel network in order to restore disconnected vessel lines and eliminate noisy lines. In the second step, a multiscale line-tracking procedure allows detecting all vessels having similar dimensions at a chosen scale. Computing the individual image maps requires different steps. First, a number of points are preselected using the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix. These points are expected to be near to a vessel axis. Then, for each preselected point, the response map is computed from gradient information of the image at the current scale. Finally, the multiscale image map is derived after combining the individual image maps at different scales (sizes). Two publicly available datasets have been used to test the performance of the suggested method. The main dataset is the STARE project's dataset and the second one is the DRIVE dataset. The experimental results, applied on the STARE dataset, show a maximum accuracy average of around 94.02%. Also, when performed on the DRIVE database, the maximum accuracy average reaches 91.55%.

Identifiers

PMID25977682
PMCPMC4421077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.