Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25977677›Full record

ArticleCurrent neuropharmacology2014

An update of the classical and novel methods used for measuring fast neurotransmitters during normal and brain altered function.

Victor Hugo Cifuentes Castro, Carmen Lucía López Valenzuela, Juan Carlos Salazar Sánchez, Kenia Pardo Peña, Silvia J López Pérez, Jorge Ortega Ibarra, Alberto Morales Villagrán

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current neuropharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fabrication andJournal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A Novel Microbiosensor Microarray for ContinuousFrontiers in neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  10. Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  11. On the Accuracy ofFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victor Hugo Cifuentes CastroDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Camino Ramón Padilla Sánchez 2100, Nextipac, Zapopan, Jalisco, México, Zip code: 45110, Mexico.
Carmen Lucía López ValenzuelaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Camino Ramón Padilla Sánchez 2100, Nextipac, Zapopan, Jalisco, México, Zip code: 45110, Mexico.
Juan Carlos Salazar SánchezDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Camino Ramón Padilla Sánchez 2100, Nextipac, Zapopan, Jalisco, México, Zip code: 45110, Mexico.
Kenia Pardo PeñaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Camino Ramón Padilla Sánchez 2100, Nextipac, Zapopan, Jalisco, México, Zip code: 45110, Mexico.
Silvia J López PérezDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Camino Ramón Padilla Sánchez 2100, Nextipac, Zapopan, Jalisco, México, Zip code: 45110, Mexico.
Jorge Ortega IbarraDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Camino Ramón Padilla Sánchez 2100, Nextipac, Zapopan, Jalisco, México, Zip code: 45110, Mexico.
Alberto Morales VillagránDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Camino Ramón Padilla Sánchez 2100, Nextipac, Zapopan, Jalisco, México, Zip code: 45110, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand better the cerebral functions, several methods have been developed to study the brain activity, they could be related with morphological, electrophysiological, molecular and neurochemical techniques. Monitoring neurotransmitter concentration is a key role to know better how the brain works during normal or pathological conditions, as well as for studying the changes in neurotransmitter concentration with the use of several drugs that could affect or reestablish the normal brain activity. Immediate response of the brain to environmental conditions is related with the release of the fast acting neurotransmission by glutamate (Glu), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and acetylcholine (ACh) through the opening of ligand-operated ion channels. Neurotransmitter release is mainly determined by the classical microdialysis technique, this is generally coupled to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Detection of neurotransmitters can be done by fluorescence, optical density, electrochemistry or other detection systems more sophisticated. Although the microdialysis method is the golden technique to monitor the brain neurotransmitters, it has a poor temporal resolution. Recently, with the use of biosensor the drawback of temporal resolution has been improved considerably, however other inconveniences have merged, such as stability, reproducibility and the lack of reliable biosensors mainly for GABA. The aim of this review is to show the important advances in the different ways to measure neurotransmitter concentrations; both with the use of classic techniques as well as with the novel methods and alternant approaches to improve the temporal resolution.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineGABAGlutamatemeasurement

Identifiers

PMID25977677
PMCPMC4428024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.