ArticleThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS
Primary breast angiosarcoma: pathological and radiological diagnosis.
Article in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case report of primary breast angiosarcoma: An uncommon malignancy.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Stewart-Treves Syndrome: A Rare But Aggressive Complication of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.European journal of breast health · 2021Article
- Primary breast angiosarcoma resembling a common benign tumor: A case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- Primary Angiosarcoma Of the Breast: A Case Report.Journal of radiology case reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary breast angiosarcoma is a very rare aggressive mesenchymal tumor, which may represent only 0.04% of all breast malignant tumors. We report a case of primary angiosarcoma in the breast of a 22-year-old woman who presented with a mass in her right breast. Ultrasonography revealed a large heterogeneous lobulated mass lesion consistent with a fibroadenoma or phyllodes tumor. After a period of six months, she presented with nipple retraction, so a core needle biopsy was performed. Histopathology revealed a well differentiated angiosarcoma (grade I/III), but in the mastectomy specimen, numerous neoplastic multinucleated giant cells were evident, which resembled those found in other sarcomas, such as malignant fibrous histiocytoma or extra skeletal osteogenic sarcoma, and this caused difficulty making the diagnosis. Using immunohistochemical (IHC) studies, neoplastic cells were positively stained for CD31, CD34, and factor VIII-related antigens, which confirmed that the tumor was a high grade, poorly differentiated angiosarcoma (grade III/III). In conclusion, angiosarcomas may have different grade patterns in the same tumor, and as a result it is necessary to examine the whole tumor for definite grading. Imaging findings in angiosarcomas are non-specific, therefore they may misdiagnosed, frequently by other benign lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25977636PMC4418128W2403787989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.