Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25977557›Full record

ReviewScience (New York, N.Y.)2015

Cell biology. On being the right (cell) size.

Miriam B Ginzberg, Ran Kafri, Marc Kirschner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 227 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
227citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

227 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Experimental evolution of cellular miniaturization reveals a putative mechanism for cell size evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. MR-SPJournal of proteome research · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cell size modulates ferroptosis susceptibility.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

167 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miriam B GinzbergDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ran KafriThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Marc KirschnerDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF MITOSISR01GM026875 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI KIRSCHNER, MARC WALLACE · 1985 to 2019
$18.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different animal cell types have distinctive and characteristic sizes. How a particular cell size is specified by differentiation programs and physiology remains one of the fundamental unknowns in cell biology. In this Review, we explore the evidence that individual cells autonomously sense and specify their own size. We discuss possible mechanisms by which size-sensing and size-specification may take place. Last, we explore the physiological implications of size control: Why is it important that particular cell types maintain a particular size? We develop these questions through examination of the current literature and pose the questions that we anticipate will guide this field in the upcoming years.

Indexed as

Cell SizeAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsEpithelial CellsFemaleG1 PhaseHumansMammary Glands, HumanMice

Identifiers

PMID25977557
PMCPMC4533982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.