ArticleGenome announcements2015
Draft Genome Sequences of Two Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Sputum of Kazakh Patients.
Article in Genome announcements, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Characterization of Drug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Whole-Genome Sequence-Based Characterization of Pre-XDRDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Genomic Analysis of Multidrug-ResistantFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Whole genome sequence data ofData in brief · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here, we report the draft genome sequences of two clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB-476 and MTB-489) isolated from sputum of Kazakh patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.