Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25977096›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2016

Pre-diagnostic vitamin D concentrations and cancer risks in older individuals: an analysis of cohorts participating in the CHANCES consortium.

José Manuel Ordóñez-Mena, Ben Schöttker, Veronika Fedirko, Mazda Jenab, Anja Olsen, Jytte Halkjær, Ellen Kampman, Lisette de Groot, Eugene Jansen, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dual effect of vitamin DBMC cancer · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 10 countries.

José Manuel Ordóñez-MenaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ben SchöttkerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Veronika FedirkoRollins School of Public Health, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mazda JenabInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Anja OlsenDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jytte HalkjærDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ellen KampmanDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lisette de GrootDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Eugene JansenCenter for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
H Bas Bueno-de-MesquitaDepartment of Chronic Diseases, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Petra H PeetersDivision of Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Galatios SiganosDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Tom WilsgaardDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Laura PernaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bernd HolleczekSaarland Cancer Registry, Saarland, Germany.
Ulrika Pettersson-KymmerDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Neurosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Philippos OrfanosHellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.
Antonia TrichopoulouHellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.
Paolo BoffettaHellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. h.brenner@dkfz.de.
Danish Cancer Society · DKGerman Cancer Research Center · DEImperial College London · GBNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOWageningen University & Research · NLCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEEmory University · USHeidelberg University · DEIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USKrebsregister Saarland · DENational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLUmeå University · SE

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The associations of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations with total and site-specific cancer incidence have been examined in several epidemiological studies with overall inconclusive findings. Very little is known about the association of vitamin D with cancer incidence in older populations. We assessed the association of pre-diagnostic serum 25(OH)D levels with incidence of all cancers combined and incidence of lung, colorectal, breast, prostate and lymphoid malignancies among older adults. Pre-diagnostic 25(OH)D concentrations and cancer incidence were available in total for 15,486 older adults (mean age 63, range 50-84 years) participating in two cohort studies: ESTHER (Germany) and TROMSØ (Norway); and a subset of previously published nested-case control data from a another cohort study: EPIC-Elderly (Greece, Denmark, Netherlands, Spain and Sweden) from the CHANCES consortium on health and aging. Cox proportional hazards or logistic regression were used to derive multivariable adjusted hazard and odds ratios, respectively, and their 95% confidence intervals across 25(OH)D categories. Meta-analyses with random effects models were used to pool study-specific risk estimates. Overall, lower 25(OH)D concentrations were not significantly associated with increased incidence of most of the cancers assessed. However, there was some evidence of increased breast cancer and decreased lymphoma risk with higher 25(OH)D concentrations. Our meta-analyses with individual participant data from three large European population-based cohort studies provide at best limited support for the hypothesis that vitamin D may have a major role in cancer development and prevention among European older adults.

Indexed as

AgingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEuropeFemaleHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOdds RatioPopulation SurveillanceRisk FactorsVitamin D25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin DVitaminsAgeingCancerCHANCESCohortVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID25977096
OpenAlexW2133187521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.