Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25976832›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2015

Online tracking of interventional devices for endovascular aortic repair.

Daniele Volpi, Mhd H Sarhan, Reza Ghotbi, Nassir Navab, Diana Mateus, Stefanie Demirci

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Robust navigation support in lowest dose image setting.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019
    Article
  3. Intraoperative stent segmentation in X-ray fluoroscopy for endovascular aortic repair.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniele VolpiComputer Aided Medical Procedures, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstr 3, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Mhd H Sarhan
Reza Ghotbi
Nassir Navab
Diana Mateus
Stefanie Demirci

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe continuous integration of innovative imaging modalities into conventional vascular surgery rooms has led to an urgent need for computer assistance solutions that support the smooth integration of imaging within the surgical workflow. In particular, endovascular interventions performed under 2D fluoroscopic or angiographic imaging only, require reliable and fast navigation support for complex treatment procedures such as endovascular aortic repair. Despite the vast variety of image-based guide wire and catheter tracking methods, an adoption of these for detecting and tracking the stent graft delivery device is not possible due to its special geometry and intensity appearance.

methodsIn this paper, we present, for the first time, the automatic detection and tracking of the stent graft delivery device in 2D fluoroscopic sequences on the fly. The proposed approach is based on the robust principal component analysis and extends the conventional batch processing towards an online tracking system that is able to detect and track medical devices on the fly.

resultsThe proposed method has been tested on interventional sequences of four different clinical cases. In the lack of publicly available ground truth data, we have further initiated a crowd sourcing strategy that has resulted in 200 annotations by unexperienced users, 120 of which were used to establish a ground truth dataset for quantitatively evaluating our algorithm. In addition, we have performed a user study amongst our clinical partners for qualitative evaluation of the results.

conclusionsAlthough we calculated an average error in the range of nine pixels, the fact that our tracking method functions on the fly and is able to detect stent grafts in all unfolding stages without fine-tuning of parameters has convinced our clinical partners and they all agreed on the very high clinical relevance of our method.

Indexed as

InternetAngiographyAortaCatheterizationEndovascular ProceduresFluoroscopyHumansStentsSurgery, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.