ArticleCommunity mental health journal2016
Community-Academic Partnership Participation.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining the strategic utilization of Community-Academic Partnerships as a research engagement method in clinical and public health research within urban settings: a qualitative analysis.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Determinants of perceived beneficial impact of a community-university partnership in an urban environment: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Evaluating a community academic partnership to advance equity-focused cancer genetic implementation research: a qualitative analysis of partner perspectives.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Community Involvement and Development in an Orthopedic Hospital.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Community Forums as Amplifiers of Communities' Voices: Isolated Communities in Puerto Rico.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Perspectives of Community Partners Involved in an Academic Training to Address Clinicians' Implicit Bias.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2023Article
- Non-Cooperation within a School-Based Wellness Program during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Qualitative Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Supporting the inclusion and retention of autistic students: Exploring teachers' and paraeducators' use of evidence-based practices in public elementary schools.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Exploring Corporate Stakeholders' Perspectives on Building Capacity for Employee Engagement in Workplace Wellness Initiatives.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- Improving Community Advisory Board Engagement in Precision Medicine Research to Reduce Health Disparities.Journal of health disparities research and practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Community-academic partnerships (CAPs) improve the research process, outcomes, and yield benefits for the community and researchers. This exploratory study examined factors important in community stakeholders' decision to participate in CAPs. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) community stakeholders, previously contacted to participate in a CAP (n = 18), completed the 15-item Decision to Participate Questionnaire (DPQ). The DPQ assessed reasons for participating or declining participation in the ASD CAP. CAP participants rated networking with other providers, fit of collaboration with agency philosophy, and opportunity for future training/consultations as factors more important in their decision to participate in the ASD CAP than nonparticipants. Nonparticipants reported the number of requests to participate in research as more important in their decision to decline participation than participants. Findings reveal important factors in community stakeholders' decision to participate in CAPs that may provide guidance on increasing community engagement in CAPs and help close the science-to-service gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.