ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2015
ISAC's Gating-ML 2.0 data exchange standard for gating description.
Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic phenotyping using exhaustive projection pursuit.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Optimization of a Cas12a-Driven Synthetic Gene Regulatory Network System.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- Genomically integrated cassettes swapping: bringing modularity to the strain level in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.FEMS yeast research · 2025Article
- Unique gating strategy identifier based on the Prime Population System and Gödel Numbers.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- FlowKit: A Python Toolkit for Integrated Manual and Automated Cytometry Analysis Workflows.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Reporting and connecting cell type names and gating definitions through ontologies.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- CytoML for cross-platform cytometry data sharing.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2018Article
- The Computational article format: Software as a research output.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2018Article
- Computational flow cytometry: helping to make sense of high-dimensional immunology data.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2016Review
- Standardizing Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Analysis from the Human ImmunoPhenotyping Consortium.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Validation of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy in cancer: Volume I - pre-analytical and analytical validation.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lack of software interoperability with respect to gating has traditionally been a bottleneck preventing the use of multiple analytical tools and reproducibility of flow cytometry data analysis by independent parties. To address this issue, ISAC developed Gating-ML, a computer file format to encode and interchange gates. Gating-ML 1.5 was adopted and published as an ISAC Candidate Recommendation in 2008. Feedback during the probationary period from implementors, including major commercial software companies, instrument vendors, and the wider community, has led to a streamlined Gating-ML 2.0. Gating-ML has been significantly simplified and therefore easier to support by software tools. To aid developers, free, open source reference implementations, compliance tests, and detailed examples are provided to stimulate further commercial adoption. ISAC has approved Gating-ML as a standard ready for deployment in the public domain and encourages its support within the community as it is at a mature stage of development having undergone extensive review and testing, under both theoretical and practical conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.