ArticleJournal of biomechanics2015
An approach for patient-specific multi-domain vascular mesh generation featuring spatially varying wall thickness modeling.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geometry-Aware Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Digital Twin for Patient-Specific Wall Stress Mapping.Research square · 2026Article
- Geometry quantification for growth assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms under surveillance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An Integrated Framework for Automated Image Segmentation and Personalized Wall Stress Estimation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- On the Relative Effects of Wall and Intraluminal Thrombus Constitutive Material Properties in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stress.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2025Article
- Automatic Segmentation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm From Computed Tomography Angiography Using a Patch-Based Dilated UNet Model.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2025Article
- A Predictive Analysis of Wall Stress in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using a Neural Network Model.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2021Article
- Higher oscillatory shear index is related to aneurysm recanalization after coil embolization in posterior communicating artery aneurysms.Acta neurochirurgica · 2021Article
- A Comparative Classification Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms by Machine Learning Algorithms.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2020Article
- Decision Tree Based Classification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Geometry Quantification Measures.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2018Article
- Geometric surrogates of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall mechanics.Medical engineering & physics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we present a computationally efficient image-derived volume mesh generation approach for vasculatures that implements spatially varying patient-specific wall thickness with a novel inward extrusion of the wall surface mesh. Multi-domain vascular meshes with arbitrary numbers, locations, and patterns of both iliac bifurcations and thrombi can be obtained without the need to specify features or landmark points as input. In addition, the mesh output is coordinate-frame independent and independent of the image grid resolution with high dimensional accuracy and mesh quality, devoid of errors typically found in off-the-shelf image-based model generation workflows. The absence of deformable template models or Cartesian grid-based methods enables the present approach to be sufficiently robust to handle aneurysmatic geometries with highly irregular shapes, arterial branches nearly parallel to the image plane, and variable wall thickness. The assessment of the methodology was based on i) estimation of the surface reconstruction accuracy, ii) validation of the output mesh using an aneurysm phantom, and iii) benchmarking the volume mesh quality against other frameworks. For the phantom image dataset (pixel size 0.105 mm; slice spacing 0.7 mm; and mean wall thickness 1.401±0.120 mm), the average wall thickness in the mesh was 1.459±0.123 mm. The absolute error in average wall thickness was 0.060±0.036 mm, or about 8.6% of the largest image grid spacing (0.7 mm) and 4.36% of the actual mean wall thickness. Mesh quality metrics and the ability to reproduce regional variations of wall thickness were found superior to similar alternative frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.