Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25975974›Full record

Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2015

Intra-observer and inter-observer repeatability of ocular surface interferometer in measuring lipid layer thickness.

Yang Zhao, Carin Lay San Tan, Louis Tong

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Dry Eye Analyzer in Participants With and Without Symptoms of Dry Eye.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Repeatability of lipid layer thickness using LipiView® following removal of contact lenses and its relationship to comfort.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang ZhaoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. zhaoyang.work@gmail.com.
Carin Lay San TanSingapore National Eye Center, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, 168751, Singapore, Singapore. carin.tan.l.s@snec.com.sg.
Louis TongSingapore National Eye Center, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, 168751, Singapore, Singapore. Louis.tong.h.t@snec.com.sg.
Singapore National Eye Center · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTear lipid morphology is important for normal tear function. Recently, there have been clinical studies using interferometry to assess lipid layer thickness (LLT). The aim of the study is to examine the repeatability of a commercially available interferometer.

methodsTwo observers measured LLT in twenty Asian subjects (20 eyes) using an interferometer (LipiView® ocular surface interferometer, TearScience Inc, Morrisville, NC). Dry eye symptoms, tear break up time (TBUT) and corneal fluorescein staining were also prospectively evaluated.

resultsData for 20 participants are presented for either right or left eye (randomly selected). The mean LLT ± standard deviation of these participants was 53.53 ± 14.59 nm. When a single observer repeated the imaging on the same day, the coefficient of repeatability was 16 nm and the 95% limits of agreement were between -11 nm and 18 nm. When a different observer repeated the scan, the coefficient of repeatability was 13 nm and limits of agreement were -9 nm and 16 nm. LLT was not significantly associated with TBUT, presence of any corneal staining in any corneal zones, or symptomatic status.

conclusionWith the repeatability of measurements being known, the significance of LLT changes measured by this interferometer may be better interpreted. In this small Asian study, the LLT was lower than previously reported studies.

Indexed as

AdultCorneaDry Eye SyndromesFemaleFluoresceinFluorescent DyesHumansInterferometryLipidsMaleMeibomian GlandsObserver VariationProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTearsFluoresceinFluorescent DyesLipids

Identifiers

PMID25975974
PMCPMC4462010
OpenAlexW1963131749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.