Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25975818›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2015

Neuroprotection after major cardiovascular surgery.

Jose Torres, Koto Ishida

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jose TorresDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, 530 First Avenue, Suite 5A, New York, NY, 10016, USA, jose.torres2@nyumc.org.
Koto Ishida
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementNeurologic injury is a common complication of major cardiovascular procedures including coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, coronary valve replacement, and aortic aneurysm surgery. However, despite ongoing research in the field of neuroprotection, there are currently few pharmacologic and interventional options to effectively protect the brain and spinal cord in the postoperative period. CSF drainage after aortic surgery currently stands as the only neuroprotective intervention that has been consistently shown to protect the spinal cord from ischemic injury, leading to significantly fewer patients with paraplegia and paraparesis. There is promising but conflicting evidence about the potential benefits of agents such as dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, magnesium, and erythropoietin in preventing postoperative stroke and cognitive dysfunction. Postoperative hypothermia has also been studied in preventing neurologic injury after cardiopulmonary bypass. With the rate of cardiovascular surgeries increasing yearly, further investigations are needed to validate many of these therapies and discover new ways to protect the brain and spinal cord from intraoperative and postoperative injuries in this high-risk population.

Identifiers

PMID25975818
OpenAlexW2105716708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.