Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25975718›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical pharmacology2015

Quantification of the impact of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs on irinotecan pharmacokinetics and SN-38 exposure.

Alexander K Berg, Jan C Buckner, Evanthia Galanis, Kurt A Jaeckle, Matthew M Ames, Joel M Reid

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of epilepsy in brain tumors.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander K BergDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc., Maple Grove, MN, USA.
Jan C BucknerDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Evanthia GalanisDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kurt A JaeckleDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, MN, USA.
Matthew M AmesDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Joel M ReidDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUpsher-Smith Laboratories (United States) · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHU10CA025224 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 1985 to 2013
$85.0M
TRAINING GRANT IN CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYT32GM008685 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Liewei Wang · 1998 to 2026
$8.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA11474NCI NIH HHS CA-25224NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS U10 CA025224NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008685NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM08685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The population pharmacokinetic model reported here was developed using data from 2 phase 2 trials of irinotecan for treatment of malignant glioma to quantify the impact of concomitant therapy with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) on irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Patients received weekly irinotecan doses of 100 to 400 mg/m(2) , and plasma samples were collected and analyzed for irinotecan and its APC, SN-38, and SN-38G metabolites. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was employed for population pharmacokinetic analysis. Concomitant therapy with phenytoin, phenobarbital, or carbamazepine increased the clearances of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38G but not APC. SN-38 clearance was 2-fold higher with concomitant EIAED use, resulting in 40% lower SN-38 exposure. Evaluation of additional covariates revealed no clinically relevant effects of sex or concomitant corticosteroid use. The population pharmacokinetic model suggests that a 1.7-fold increase in irinotecan dose may compensate for decreases in SN-38 exposure in the presence of concomitant EIAEDs. Although slightly more conservative, this dose adjustment is consistent with those recommended based on increases in the maximally tolerated dose for malignant glioma patients receiving EIAEDs and may be an appropriate starting point for further investigation when extrapolating to other cancer types or alternative regimens.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnticonvulsantsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBrain NeoplasmsCamptothecinCarbamazepineDrug InteractionsEnzyme InductionFemaleGliomaGlucuronatesHumansIrinotecanMaleMiddle Aged7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin beta-glucuronideAnticonvulsantsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinCarbamazepineGlucuronatesIrinotecanPhenobarbitalPhenytoindrug-drug interactionenzyme-Inducing antiepileptic drugsirinotecanSN-38

Identifiers

PMID25975718
PMCPMC4591103
OpenAlexW1564520359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.