Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25975716›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Non-synonymous mutations mapped to chromosome X associated with andrological and growth traits in beef cattle.

Gregório Miguel Ferreira de Camargo, Laercio R Porto-Neto, Matthew J Kelly, Rowan J Bunch, Sean M McWilliam, Humberto Tonhati, Sigrid A Lehnert, Marina R S Fortes, Stephen S Moore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome-Wide Identification of KiwifruitInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review: Genomics of bull fertility.Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregório Miguel Ferreira de CamargoDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil. gregoriocamargo@hotmail.com.
Laercio R Porto-NetoCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Agriculture Flagship, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia. laercio.portoneto@csiro.au.
Matthew J KellySchool of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. m.kelly7@uq.edu.au.
Rowan J BunchCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Agriculture Flagship, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia. rowan.bunch@csiro.au.
Sean M McWilliamCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Agriculture Flagship, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia. sean.mcwilliam@csiro.au.
Humberto TonhatiDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil. tonhati@fcav.unesp.br.
Sigrid A LehnertCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Agriculture Flagship, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia. sigrid.lehnert@csiro.au.
Marina R S FortesSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. m.fortes@uq.edu.au.
Stephen S MooreQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4067, Australia. s.moore3@uq.edu.au.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRHealth Sciences and Nutrition · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious genome-wide association analyses identified QTL regions in the X chromosome for percentage of normal sperm and scrotal circumference in Brahman and Tropical Composite cattle. These traits are important to be studied because they are indicators of male fertility and are correlated with female sexual precocity and reproductive longevity. The aim was to investigate candidate genes in these regions and to identify putative causative mutations that influence these traits. In addition, we tested the identified mutations for female fertility and growth traits.

resultsUsing a combination of bioinformatics and molecular assay technology, twelve non-synonymous SNPs in eleven genes were genotyped in a cattle population. Three and nine SNPs explained more than 1% of the additive genetic variance for percentage of normal sperm and scrotal circumference, respectively. The SNPs that had a major influence in percentage of normal sperm were mapped to LOC100138021 and TAF7L genes; and in TEX11 and AR genes for scrotal circumference. One SNP in TEX11 was explained ~13% of the additive genetic variance for scrotal circumference at 12 months. The tested SNP were also associated with weight measurements, but not with female fertility traits.

conclusionsThe strong association of SNPs located in X chromosome genes with male fertility traits validates the QTL. The implicated genes became good candidates to be used for genetic evaluation, without detrimentally influencing female fertility traits.

Indexed as

MutationPhenotypeRed MeatAndrologyAnimalsCattleFemaleFertilityGenotyping TechniquesLinkage DisequilibriumMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideScrotumSpermatozoaX Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID25975716
PMCPMC4432507
OpenAlexW1505869515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.