Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25975429›Full record

Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2015

Prospective study of recovery from copperhead snake envenomation: an observational study.

Eric J Lavonas, Charles J Gerardo, Copperhead Snakebite Recovery Outcome Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01651299 (Observational Study of Recovery From Copperhead Snake Envenomation), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01651299 completednot on this map

Observational Study of Recovery From Copperhead Snake Envenomation

TypeobservationalSponsorBTG International Inc.Ran2012 to 2013Enrolled20ConditionsCopperhead Snake Envenomation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Total CroFab and Anavip Antivenom Vial Administration in US Rattlesnake Envenomations: 2019-2021.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric J LavonasRocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, 777 Bannock Street, MC 0180, Denver, CO, 80204, USA. eric.lavonas@rmpdc.org.
Charles J GerardoDivision of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. charles.gerardo@duke.edu.
Copperhead Snakebite Recovery Outcome Group
Duke University · USDenver Health Medical Center · US

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough much is known about signs, symptoms, and management in the acute phase of crotaline snake envenomation, little is known about signs, symptoms, function, and quality of life during the recovery phase. The purpose of this observational pilot investigation is to evaluate the utility of several clinical outcome instruments in the setting of copperhead snakebite, and to characterize the clinical course of recovery.

methodsThis is a multi-center prospective, open-label, observational study of patients envenomated by copperhead snakes. We administered the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), Work Productivity and Ability Impairment: Special Health Problem (WPAI: SHP), Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Patient's Global Assessment of Recovery (PGAR), and SF-36 instruments, obtained numeric pain rating scales, and measured grip strength, walking speed, and swelling prior to hospital discharge and 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after envenomation.

results20 subjects were enrolled; none were lost to follow-up. Most (80%) had moderate severity swelling, and most (75%) received antivenom. Across the broad range of measures, abnormalities of pain, swelling, impairments of physical and role function, and quality of life persisted for 7-14 days in most subjects. Validated self-reported outcome measures, such as the DASH, LEFS, PSFS, PGIC, SF-36, and the daily activities impairment portion of the WPAI: SHP were more responsive than measurements of swelling or walking speed. Data quality issues limited the utility of the work impairment portion of the WPAI: SHP. Residual signs, symptoms, and impairment in some subjects lasted through the 28-day study period. The study design precluded any assessment of the effectiveness of antivenom.

conclusionsSigns, symptoms, impaired function, and decreased quality of life typically last 7 - 14 days after copperhead envenomation. Several tools appear responsive and useful in studying recovery from pit viper envenomation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01651299.

Indexed as

AgkistrodonPatient Outcome AssessmentRecovery of FunctionActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAnimalsAntiveninsDisability EvaluationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesAntivenins

Identifiers

PMID25975429
PMCPMC4449608
OpenAlexW1535399514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.