Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25975273›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Autoantibodies in breast cancer sera are not epiphenomena and may participate in carcinogenesis.

Félix Fernández Madrid, Marie-Claire Maroun, Ofelia A Olivero, Michael Long, Azadeh Stark, Lawrence I Grossman, Walter Binder, Jingsheng Dong, Matthew Burke, S David Nathanson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Anti-nuclear antibodies in patients with breast cancer.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Félix Fernández MadridDepartment of Internal Medicine- Division of Rheumatology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 640 Canfield, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. fmadrid@med.wayne.edu.
Marie-Claire MarounDepartment of Internal Medicine- Division of Rheumatology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 640 Canfield, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. mmaroun@med.wayne.edu.
Ofelia A OliveroNational Cancer Institute, NIH, Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, 37 Convent Dr. MSC 4255, Bldg 37 Rm 4032, Bethesda, MD, 20892-4255, USA. oliveroo@exchange.nih.gov.
Michael LongDepartment of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. plong@med.wayne.edu.
Azadeh StarkDepartment of Pathology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. ASTARK1@hfhs.org.
Lawrence I GrossmanCenter for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 540 East Canfield, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. lgrossman@wayne.edu.
Walter BinderINOVA Diagnostics Inc, 9900 Old Grove Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA. cpeebles@sd.inovadx.com.
Jingsheng DongDepartment of Internal Medicine- Division of Rheumatology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 640 Canfield, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. jinsheng3@gmail.com.
Matthew BurkeDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital and Health Network, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. MBurke1@hfhs.org.
S David NathansonDepartment of Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. Dnathan1@hfhs.org.
Richard ZarboDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. rzarbo1@hfhs.org.
Dhananjay ChitaleDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. dchital1@hfhs.org.
Rocío Zeballos-ChávezDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. plong@med.wayne.edu.
Carol PeeblesINOVA Diagnostics Inc, 9900 Old Grove Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA. cpeebles@sd.inovadx.com.
Wayne State University · USHenry Ford Hospital · USHenry Ford Health System · USNova Medical (United States) · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Development and Validation of a Panel of Breast Cancer for the Early Diagnosis ofR01CA122277 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FERNANDEZ-MADRID, FELIX RODOLFO · 2008 to 2010
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this work was to demonstrate that autoantibodies in breast cancer sera are not epiphenomena, and exhibit unique immunologic features resembling the rheumatic autoimmune diseases.

methodsWe performed a comprehensive study of autoantibodies on a collection of sera from women with breast cancer or benign breast disease, undergoing annual screening mammography. All women in this study had suspicious mammography assessment and underwent a breast biopsy. We used indirect immunofluorescence, the crithidia assay for anti-dsDNA antibodies, and multiple ELISAs for extractable nuclear antigens.

resultsAutoantibodies were detected in virtually all patients with breast cancer, predominantly of the IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes. The profile detected in breast cancer sera showed distinctive features, such as antibodies targeting mitochondria, centrosomes, centromeres, nucleoli, cytoskeleton, and multiple nuclear dots. The majority of sera showing anti-mitochondrial antibodies did not react with the M2 component of pyruvate dehydrogenase, characteristic of primary biliary cirrhosis. Anti-centromere antibodies were mainly anti-CENP-B. ELISAs for extractable nuclear antigens and the assays for dsDNA were negative.

conclusionsThe distinctive autoantibody profile detected in BC sera is the expression of tumor immunogenicity. Although some of these features resemble those in the rheumatic autoimmune diseases and primary biliary cirrhosis, the data suggest the involvement of an entirely different set of epithelial antigens in breast cancer. High titer autoantibodies targeting centrosomes, centromeres, and mitochondria were detected in a small group of healthy women with suspicious mammography assessment and no cancer by biopsy; this suggests that the process triggering autoantibody formation starts in the pre-malignant phase and that future studies using validated autoantibody panels may allow detection of breast cancer risk in asymptomatic women. Autoantibodies developing in breast cancer are not epiphenomena, but likely reflect an antigen-driven autoimmune response triggered by epitopes developing in the mammary gland during breast carcinogenesis. Our results support the validity of the multiple studies reporting association of autoantibodies with breast cancer. Results further suggest significant promise for the development of panels of breast cancer-specific, premalignant-phase autoantibodies, as well as studies on the autoantibody response to tumor associated antigens in the pathogenesis of cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, AntinuclearAntigens, NuclearBreast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma in SituCell NucleolusCentromereCentromere Protein BCentrosomeFemaleHumansAntibodies, AntinuclearAntigens, NuclearCentromere Protein BImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID25975273
PMCPMC4453436
OpenAlexW1573090560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.