Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25975179›Full record

ArticleCancer2015

Male-female patient differences in the association between end-of-life discussions and receipt of intensive care near death.

Rashmi K Sharma, Holly G Prigerson, Frank J Penedo, Paul K Maciejewski

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. End-of-life care preferences for people with advanced cancer and their families in intensive care units: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. End-of-Life Preferences: A Randomized Trial of Framing Comfort Care as Refusal of Treatment in the Context of COVID-19.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rashmi K SharmaDivision of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Holly G PrigersonCenter for Research on End-of-Life Care, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Frank J PenedoDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Paul K MaciejewskiCenter for Research on End-of-Life Care, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Cornell University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
Psychosocial Approaches to Better Understanding & End-Stage Cancer Care (PROTECT)R35CA197730 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Holly Gwen Prigerson · 2015 to 2026
$11.2M
Career Development in Women's Health (CDWH)K12HD055884 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DUNAIF, ANDREA E · 2007 to 2016
$4.2M
Quality of Death: Ethnic and Psychosocial InfluencesR01CA106370 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PRIGERSON, HOLLY GWEN · 2004 to 2015
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA 106370NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106370NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197730NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient gender plays a significant role in patient-physician communication, patients' understanding of illness, and the aggressiveness of end-of-life (EoL) care. However, little is known about the extent to which gender differences in the effects of EoL discussions on EoL care contribute to gender differences in EoL care. The current study was aimed at determining whether gender differences exist in the receipt of intensive care unit (ICU) care near death and in the association between EoL discussions and the receipt of EoL ICU care.

methodsThis was a multisite, prospective cohort study of patients (n = 353) with metastatic cancers who were identified as terminally ill at study enrollment and were interviewed at a median of 4.1 months before their deaths. Postmortem chart reviews and caregiver interviews documented ICU stays in the last week of life.

resultsPatients who received ICU care at the EoL were more likely to be male than those who did not (73% vs 52%, P = .02). After adjustments for potential confounders, male patients reporting an EoL discussion were less likely to have an ICU stay in the last week of life than male patients with no EoL discussion (adjusted odds ratio, 0.26, 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.91; P = .04). There was no association between EoL discussions and ICU stays near death among female patients.

conclusionsMen with advanced cancers are more likely than women to receive aggressive, nonbeneficial ICU care near death. Gender differences in the effects of EoL discussions on EoL care likely contribute to and may even explain gender differences in the receipt of ICU care in the last week of life.

Indexed as

Critical CareTerminal CareAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSex Characteristicsadvanced cancercommunicationend-of-life careend-of-life discussionsgender differences

Identifiers

PMID25975179
PMCPMC4529758
OpenAlexW1598498922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.