Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25974871›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry

Detection of minimal residual disease in B lymphoblastic leukemia using viSNE.

Joseph A DiGiuseppe, Michelle D Tadmor, Dana Pe'er

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Single-Cell Analysis in Cancer Genomics.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph A DiGiuseppeDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut.
Michelle D TadmorDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Dana Pe'erDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Columbia University · USHartford Hospital · US

Funding

Single cell mapping of developmental trajectories underlying health and diseaseDP1HD084071 · NICHD · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI PE'ER, DANA · 2014 to 2018
$4.2M
Genetic variation and regulatory networks: Mechanisms and complexityDP2OD002414 · OD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PE'ER, DANA · 2007 to 2009
$2.5M
Integrative Cancer Genomics: Drivers, Pathways and DrugsR01CA164729 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PE'ER, DANA · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP1 HD084071-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164729NCI NIH HHS R01CA164729NICHD NIH HHS DP1 HD084071NIH HHS 1-DP2-OD002414-01NIH HHS DP2 OD002414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinimal residual disease (MRD) following treatment is a robust prognostic marker in B lymphoblastic leukemia. However, the detection of MRD by flow cytometric immunophenotyping is technically challenging, and an automated method to detect MRD is therefore desirable. viSNE, a recently developed computational tool based on the t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) algorithm, has been shown to be capable of detecting synthetic "MRD-like" populations of leukemic cells created in vitro, but whether viSNE can facilitate the immunophenotypic detection of MRD in clinical samples has not been evaluated.

methodsWe applied viSNE retrospectively to 8-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping data from normal bone marrow samples, and samples from B lymphoblastic leukemia patients with or without suspected MRD on the basis of conventional manual gating.

resultsIn each of 14 bone marrow specimens containing MRD or suspected MRD, viSNE identified a putative MRD population; an abnormal composite immunophenotype was confirmed for the putative MRD in each case. MRD populations were not identified by viSNE in control bone marrow samples from patients with increased normal B-cell precursors, or in post-treatment samples from B lymphoblastic leukemia patients who did not have detectable MRD by manual gating.

conclusionviSNE shows promise as an automated method to facilitate immunophenotypic MRD detection in patients treated for B lymphoblastic leukemia.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAutomation, LaboratoryBiomarkers, TumorBone Marrow ExaminationFlow CytometryHumansImmunophenotypingLeukemia, B-CellNeoplasm, ResidualPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesStochastic ProcessesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorALLB lymphoblastic leukemiaflow cytometryminimal residual diseaseviSNE

Identifiers

PMID25974871
PMCPMC5981136
OpenAlexW1954665787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.